The applicant company’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Croatian Government (“the Government”).

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT          ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 9.

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complains that the dispute in question had not been determined by an independent and impartial tribunal.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Slovak Government (“the Government”).

requérant de ses fonctions judiciaires et de son incapacité à recourir à un contrôle juridictionnel à cet égard (article 6 § 1 de la Convention) ;   Rappellent l’obligation de l’État défendeur, en

Le Comité des Ministres a considéré que les mesures prises par la Roumanie étaient conformes à l'arrêt de la CEDH. L'affaire a été close au regard de l'article 46 de la Convention.

Les griefs que les requérantes tiraient de l’article   6 § 1 de la Convention (inexécution ou exécution tardive de décisions de justice internes), ainsi que de l’article 1 du Protocole n o 1 concernant

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.       OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION 48.

de l’homme (ci-après nommées «   la Convention   » et «   la Cour   »),   Vu l’arrêt définitif transmis par la Cour au Comité dans cette affaire et la violation de l’article 1

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

Invoquant l’article 6 § 1 de la Convention, les requérants se plaignent de la durée excessive des procédures.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Sont en cause les articles 6 § 1 de la Convention et 1 du Protocole n o 1.     QUESTIONS AUX PARTIES 1.

The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the Constitutional Court’s refusal to award her the costs of her legal representation had a deterrent effect on the exercise of her right

The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion

    The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of excessive length of the criminal proceedings. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT 7.

   ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.     The applicants complained of the limitations on access to a court.