Leaflets and posters distributed by his party in an election campaign led to complaints of incitation to hatred, discrimination and violence.

The leaflet exhorted the members of the association to vote in the municipal elections scheduled for October 2002.

court found that the statement in the leaflet had infringed F.G.’s personality rights and that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his allegations.

[the applicant] was caught by police officers while he was handing out the leaflets and a total of 24 leaflets were confiscated from him.

de lassociété LEUILLET PERE ET FILS, la société ETBI et de la Société CHRETIEN [Adresse 11] [Localité 9] représentée par Maître Guillaume RODIER de la SELARL RODIER ET HODE, avocats au barreau de PARIS

written an article about the way in which the public had reacted to the leaflet. 15.

At around 4.30 p.m. on 13 July 2013 the applicants were disseminating leaflets when they were ascending on an escalator at Icheri Sheher underground station in Baku.

That section concerned the act of “publishing or distributing leaflets, written statements and similar publications” and made that action subject to preconditions and prior formalities.

When the police asked them to show the leaflets, the applicant and her friends put the leaflets in their bags and refused to present their identity documents.

of leaflets as, according to Article 44 of Law no. 2908, the political parties were not required to do so.

  She submitted that the purpose of the leaflet was to provoke a political discussion on the Federal Army and military force in general.

great deal of noise and public disturbance” and not for distributing leaflets. 56.

représentée par Maître Aurélie BERNARD-PIOCHOT de l’AARPI ABC ASSOCIES, avocats au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 578 DEFENDEURS : [E] [D] représenté par Maître François AJE de l’AARPI ALL PARTNERS-AJE LENGLEN

L.” was displayed at the location where the public event was being held and that leaflets were available for picking up by passers-by.

The handing out of the leaflets took place at a school.

The applicant did not use to carry leaflets in his pockets; this was an exception. On this occasion he was about to hand the leaflet to a specific person whom he knew used to read his leaflets.

The Government submitted that the police had been warned by their source that the applicant might proceed to destroy the leaflets. 7.

The police submitted the leaflets to the anti-extremism unit of the Department of the Interior.

    In the run-up to mayoral elections the applicant distributed a leaflet concerning X, one of the candidates.