CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249688

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2026

18 mars 2026

They alleged that the applicant had fraudulently misappropriated considerable sums of money (exceeding USD 200,000), failed to comply with his contractual obligations, acted contrary to his clients’ interests

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14082

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2023

3 mai 2023

communicated Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non-reimbursement of costly medication for rare illness, absent sufficient proof of heightened benefit, without examining patient’s claim to contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219626

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2022

6 septembre 2022

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private and family life and correspondence, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189575

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2018

20 décembre 2018

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242678

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2025

12 mars 2025

    Was the border closure in breach of the fifth applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of her possessions, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1653

Admin. suprême

24 février 2009

24 février 2009

On the contrary, according to the principle laid down by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in its Resolution 1433(2005), diplomatic assurances were not enough unless the absence of a

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203736

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2020

20 juin 2020

On 1 July 2019 the Pomorskie Governor dismissed the applicants’ appeal, as entering a same-sex marriage in the Polish Registry would be contrary to “basic principles of the Polish law”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209235

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2021

19 mars 2021

In addition, the doctors installed an intrauterine contraceptive device into one of the applicants in order to prevent future pregnancies, again contrary to her wishes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218104

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2022

1 juin 2022

On 23 February 2017 the authorities refused as entering a same-sex marriage in the Polish Registry would be contrary to “basic principles of the Polish law”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-227788

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2023

6 septembre 2023

Bulgaria lodged on 4 November 2021 communicated on 6 September 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the lawfulness of the expropriation of applicant’s land, which he considers contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231585

Admin. suprême

12 février 2024

12 février 2024

considerations of public order for doing so since the applicant’s objection that he had to pay the maintenance was of a subjective nature and did not render the current status quo unacceptable or contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178161

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2017

25 septembre 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177847

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2017

21 septembre 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178159

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2017

26 septembre 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0525DEC004568999

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2004

25 mai 2004

damage (contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203616

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2020

9 juin 2020

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the administrative removal of the applicant, an HIV-positive openly gay man, to Uzbekistan where he would allegedly face the real risk of treatment contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179766

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2017

11 décembre 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or her right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210389

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2021

11 mai 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of religion, contrary to Article   9 of the Convention?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178269

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2017

2 octobre 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182896

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2018

17 avril 2018

It appears from the applicant’s submissions and from the materials of the case that, contrary to the domestic law, her telephone communications were intercepted without her having any quality in the criminal

Source officielle

Page 2 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →