CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

30 465 résultats pour « Beccari »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208506

Admin. suprême

12 février 2021

12 février 2021

the prison courtyard; that he did not benefit from conjugal visits; that the prison did not test for sexually transmitted diseases; and that he could not work because of his sexual orientation.

Source officielle

Page 19 sur 1524

← PrécédentSuivant →
CA

2ème chambre section C

680b1a502364a383b7747488

Appel

24 avril 2025

24 avril 2025

OGF SA C/ [R] [S] Copie exécutoire délivrée le à Selarl Leonard Vézian Selarl Becrit Glondu SCP Delran Sergent COUR D'APPELDE NÎMES CHAMBRE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243803

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2025

21 mai 2025

s placement under guardianship, the Federal Constitutional Court found that the Bayreuth Regional Court’s decision in the appeal proceedings had violated the applicant’s personality rights, notably because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116851

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2013

29 janvier 2013

He also alleges that because of the poor conditions of detention, he has contracted tuberculosis and C-hepatitis and has developed type II diabetes during his detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0113DEC005364900

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2000

13 janvier 2000

In his testimony to the police, Mr Ebigwei alleged, inter alia, that there was a risk for his life if deported to Nigeria, because he was a Christian and because of the conflict between Christians and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187184

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2018

29 septembre 2018

The expert concluded, however, that V.S. had died because of acute sepsis and not because of the applicant’s actions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184709

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2017

30 mars 2017

On 10 July 2010 the applicant called the police because her husband had beaten her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0904DEC007513901

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2003

4 septembre 2003

The applicant submits that the eviction order was not executed because the assistance of the police had not been ensured and because of the presence in the flat of a number of war veterans who had obstructed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018DEC000092103

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2007

18 octobre 2007

From 14 August 2002 to 28 November 2002 the proceedings were stayed because of the applicant’s illness.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1971297-2073394

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

  In December 1995 the applicant was dismissed from the school because she no longer met the educational and professional requirements of her post.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD001016113

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2015

3 septembre 2015

The judgment became final on 2 January 2008. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155108

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

Because M.K.’s behaviour was unpredictable, he should have been under strict supervision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD002331004

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2009

30 avril 2009

Three of them did not take place because the respondent failed to appear, one hearing was postponed because the applicant did not appear and three hearings were adjourned either because the applicant asked

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110096

Admin. suprême

10 février 2012

10 février 2012

The applicant suspected that the Iranian police had been looking for him because his friends had been tortured to disclose his name.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153425

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2015

3 mars 2015

In conclusion the Constitutional Court found that because the institution of civil marriage was open to different-sex couples, because the institution of the registered partnership was created in order

Source officielle
CA

2ème chambre section C

65a0f06f5bbe450008b2d041

Appel

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

des contentieux de la protection de [Localité 4], décision attaquée en date du 29 Août 2023, enregistrée sous le n° 23/00423 Monsieur [F] [Z] [Adresse 3] [Localité 2] Représentant : Me Noëlle BECRIT

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1926

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2008

23 septembre 2008

The applicant’s application to enrol in a faculty of theology was rejected because she did not supply an identity photograph of herself not wearing a veil, as required by the Higher Education Board rules

Source officielle
TCOM

Audience publique de vacation

6a0f13fccdc6046d477219f4

Commerce

29 avril 2026

29 avril 2026

Nomme Mme Béatrix Peret, juge commissaire. Nomme M. Frédéric Turbat, juge commissaire suppléant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC007430901

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2003

23 octobre 2003

The Government submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215085

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

However, it concluded that the applicant had not incurred any damage because of the violation of his privacy because the distress he suffered had been related to his mental illness and to the search as

Source officielle