Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre 2-4
6a182c2bcdc6046d473a79df
13 mai 2026
13 mai 2026
Frédéric Turbat, juge, Délibéré par les mêmes juges et prononcé à l'audience publique où siégeaient Mme Béatrix Peret, président, M.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-185448
9 juillet 2018
9 juillet 2018
After the proceedings had been discontinued because of the absolute time-bar, the State restored the car in the possession of the applicant, as the “perpetrator of the crime” ( му се враќа на сторителот
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cc8fbd3db21cbdd907d2
25 juin 2013
25 juin 2013
C/ Mme Béatrix DE Y... épouse Z...
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219078
18 juillet 2022
18 juillet 2022
The applicants appealed against the above judgment submitting that: (1) the penalty in the form of the removal of the online article was not prescribed by law because it was not included in the
Source officielleAudience publique de vacation
69d3d914cdc6046d474e8408
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
La minute du jugement est signée par Mme Béatrix Peret, présidente du délibéré, et par Signé électron Mine Charistelle Leopoldie, greffier.
Source officielleAudience publique de vacation
69d3e8abcdc6046d47504c71
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
N° du Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés de Paris : 882 666 993 Nomme Mme Béatrix Peret, juge commissaire.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229059
2 novembre 2023
2 novembre 2023
the search warrants did not include any relevant reasons and were formulated in extremely broad terms which gave unfettered discretion to the investigator to search for anything he wanted, and also because
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14281
23 novembre 2023
23 novembre 2023
On 11 July 2014 the applicant NGO lodged a defamation claim against a local media company and its journalist because of an article published in the newspaper run by the company.
Source officielleChambre 2-4
6a182921cdc6046d473a3da3
13 mai 2026
13 mai 2026
Frédéric Turbat, juge, Délibéré par les mêmes juges et prononcé à l'audience publique où siégeaient Mme Béatrix Peret, président, M.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171237
17 janvier 2017
17 janvier 2017
That order became binding. On 1 September 2015 the applicant’s grandson complained to the prosecutor again, because the court order was yet to be complied with.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-120859
13 mai 2013
13 mai 2013
The court found that the applicant was absconding because he failed to appear when summoned before the court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235442
9 juillet 2024
9 juillet 2024
In particular, the acts for which the applicants were convicted did not constitute a criminal offence at the time when they were committed because they did not meet the required elements of the offence
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD001833805
14 novembre 2008
14 novembre 2008
This judgment became binding on 7 June 2004.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC001015213
13 janvier 2015
13 janvier 2015
to an oral hearing had been violated because the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal had dismissed his appeal on points of law without oral hearing.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253c853bd3db21cbdd84ec6
15 juillet 1999
15 juillet 1999
administrative avec toutes les nuances qu'elle nécessite; Considérant qu'il ressort en effet des pièces versées par l'appelant que ce dernier, né à DHAKA au BANGLADESH et appartenant à la communauté BEHARI
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1025JUD006505101
25 octobre 2007
25 octobre 2007
had to be appointed by the court, and also because Mr G.'
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-423076-423439
20 octobre 2005
20 octobre 2005
Some of the applicants had previously received an order to leave Italian territory because they did not have valid residence permits; the other applicants received a deportation order on 3 March 2000 itself
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193841
9 avril 2019
9 avril 2019
The authorities refused the visa because the applicant’s income was insufficient to sponsor the children for residency and because the applicant did not qualify for an exemption.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242628
3 mars 2025
3 mars 2025
The Regional Court held that the applicant had created a dangerous situation, because the demonstration had taken place during lunch time and the steps had to be cordoned off because they had become slippery
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222488
16 décembre 2022
16 décembre 2022
Whereas the Amsterdam Regional Court acquitted the applicant of complicity in manslaughter because there was no conclusive technical evidence available and it therefore mainly came down to witness X’s
Source officiellePage 18 sur 1524