AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par M.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le huit décembre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf, a rendu l'arrêt

PC Williams did not keep any record of the meetings, nor did he make any report concerning the nature and extent of the information that was communicated to him, or if he did no such record now exists.

of (non-life threatening) attacks on family home and property – various cryptic threats uttered by Paget-Lewis could not reasonably be construed as threats against lives of family – police cannot be criticised

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Noël Prunelle, société à responsabilité

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de justice à PARIS, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Statuant sur les pourvois formés par :

France - 33402/96 Judgment 2.7.2002 [Section II] Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Conviction for criminal offence and customs offence concerning the same facts: no violation

Nor could the applicant be held to task for failing to plead a violation of her rights under Article 8 of the Convention, as those rights were not recognised in domestic law at the material time and had

    He alleged a violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention, which sets out the non bis in idem rule, and of Article 6 of the Convention.

She has not visited her daughter at the clinic, saying that she does not wish to become attached. She did not see her daughter until today and greeted their separation with total indifference.

No other signs or abnormalities were observed either on the back of the body or the genital area. There were no documents to prove identification, nor were there any valuables or money.

CHAUVIN, président Arrêt n° 633 F-D Pourvoi n° R 20-17.229 R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E _________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS ARRÊT DE LA COUR DE

’s complaint under Article 13 did not give rise to any separate issue (thirty votes to two); that there had been no violation of Article 14 or Article 18 (unanimously).

been established beyond all reasonable doubt made no difference in that regard – as there had been no adequate and effective investigation for purposes of Article 2, respondent State could not be considered

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le trois juin deux mille quatre, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le

[GK] [X] en son nom et au nom de [Z] et [I] [X], Mme [A] [HL], M. [S] [IM] en son nom et au nom de [B] et [TS] [IM], Mme [BO] [KO] en son nom et au nom de [SR] et [CG] [EI], M.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Maison Girondine, société anonyme, dont le siège est ..., en

As regards the applicant’s plea alleging non-compliance with the ne bis in idem principle, the Court of Appeal held: “Pursuant to Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights