She submits that the German courts disregarded the fact that she was Austrian and that they, therefore, unlawfully applied German penal law.

This also applied to the legal situation of the Federal Republic of Germany which was considered to be the continuation of the German Reich : incompatible ratione materiae .

The applicant had resided lawfully in Germany only since 16 July 2001, when he was granted a residence permit following his marriage to a German national. b.

in the Bock case, delivered on 29 March 1989 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case originated in an application against the Federal Republic of Germany

text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 8 March 2016   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 52095/13 Peter MARX against Germany

    The applicant claimed that the German authorities would not comply with their obligations, inherent in Article 8 of the Convention, to allow her to reside in Germany.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Mr H.-J. Behrens, of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

The summons to the appeal hearing had been served by way of public notification in Germany, despite the fact that the applicant had given notice of his new address in Spain.

  In 1986 the applicant married a German national in France, and two children were born in wedlock in 1986 and 1989.

a warrant of arrest issued in the German Democratic Republic by the District Court of Königs Wusterhausen.

The German authorities issued a German birth certificate for N. in which the applicant’s husband was registered as the legitimate father. I.

States and the entry into force of German reunification was marked by great uncertainty, particularly at the legal level.

Germany (application no. 59320/00).

HABITAT (SDH) 34, Avenue Grugliasco BP 128 38431 ECHIROLLES CEDEX représentée par la SELARL CSCB, avocats au barreau de GRENOBLE DÉFENDEURS Madame [S] [P] épouse [H] née le 04 Août 1994 2B Rue Germinal

The Court considered that the reasons advanced by the German labour courts to give effect to the immunity from jurisdiction of the ESA could not be regarded as arbitrary.

The Court considered that the reasons advanced by the German labour courts to give effect to the immunity from jurisdiction of the ESA could not be regarded as arbitrary.

    On the other hand, the applicant had a particularly serious interest in remaining in Germany as he was living, since 2010, with his two minor children who both held German nationality.

The children are born in Germany and will attend school this year.

In any event, the applicant’s son will reach the age of eighteen on 31 March 2013 and then be considered adult under German law.

The first applicant is Ms Elena Ioppa (application no. 73776/14, lodged on 24 November 2014), a citizen of Germany, born in 1970. She resides in Rheine, Germany.