Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant, within three months, 6 750 Dutch guilders

Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant, within three months, 7 200 Dutch guilders

However, although the statements as to his guilt had been made in judicial proceedings in which he had not been the defendant, those proceedings had taken place at the same time as and in connection with

case before the Grand Chamber;   Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of the Netherlands would pay the applicant, the sum of 1 000 Netherlands guilders

proceedings under national law: Court attaches weight to the finding of the Federal Court, in its judgment in the present case, that the fine in question is “penal” in character and depends on the “guilt

#xa0;   alleged subsequent violation of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions (Article 1 of the Protocol No. 1 to the Convention) as pursuant the declaration of his guilt

in accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, the sum 5 000 Dutch guilders

accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 5   500 Dutch guilders

Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant, within three months, 6 750 Dutch guilders

CREANCIER INSCRIT Représenté par Maître Elisa GUEILHERS de la SELARLU ELISA GUEILHERS AVOCAT, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 96. *** Vu le cahier des conditions de vente déposé le 12 février

CREANCIER POURSUIVANT Représenté par Maître Elisa GUEILHERS de la SELARLU ELISA GUEILHERS AVOCAT, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 96.

CREANCIER POURSUIVANT Représenté par Maître Elisa GUEILHERS de la SELARLU ELISA GUEILHERS AVOCAT, avocats au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 96.

CREANCIER INSCRIT Représenté par Maître Elisa GUEILHERS de la SELARLU ELISA GUEILHERS AVOCAT, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 96.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des pièces complémentaires, enregistrées les 13 et 14 mai 2024, Mme B A, représentée par Me Guillier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du

- that it was not necessary to give a separate decision:   a. on her other complaints;   b. on the complaints of Mr X;   - that the respondent State was to pay to Miss Y 3 000 Dutch guilders

  The Court examined the conclusions which the Courts had drawn therefrom as to the applicant's guilt.

s heirs were liable to pay the incurred fine, irrespective of their personal guilt.

height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)128 [1]   Guill