Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174476
23 mai 2017
23 mai 2017
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Was the applicant’s dismissal on account of his statements in the media in violation of his freedom of expression and thus contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163780
18 mai 2016
18 mai 2016
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152678
2 février 2015
2 février 2015
QUESTION Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of his placement in May 2007 in the Ladyzhynska correctional
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201495
28 janvier 2020
28 janvier 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant party’s right to freedom of association, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175009
30 mai 2017
30 mai 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, bearing in mind the length of the divorce proceedings and their
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175892
6 juillet 2017
6 juillet 2017
lodged on 6 March 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the investigation conducted by the Spanish authorities into the applicant’s allegations of having been subjected to treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-183695
14 mai 2018
14 mai 2018
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175576
21 juin 2017
21 juin 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (see Szerdahelyi v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-185460
10 juillet 2018
10 juillet 2018
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198326
10 octobre 2019
10 octobre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see Ferla v. Poland , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178148
28 septembre 2017
28 septembre 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, on account of his conviction under Articles 220 § 6 and 314
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242261
11 février 2025
11 février 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the fine imposed on him, as a
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182979
16 avril 2018
16 avril 2018
If the applicant has complied with the six-month requirement: - has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179968
14 décembre 2017
14 décembre 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or her right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178151
27 septembre 2017
27 septembre 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or their right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219635
6 septembre 2022
6 septembre 2022
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention with respect to the conduct of the proceedings? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-235592
3 juillet 2024
3 juillet 2024
Did the applicants’ dismissal and/or the use of private electronic communication as its basis amount to a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private life, contrary to
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126689
5 septembre 2013
5 septembre 2013
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2483
11 octobre 2007
11 octobre 2007
On the contrary, they stated that the association would abide by the law and not seek to take the place of the State authorities.Prior to applying for registration the association had given the courts
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187017
18 septembre 2018
18 septembre 2018
determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the demolition of his property before the judgment concerning his case became final and contrary
Source officiellePage 15 sur 1005
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude
Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif — Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif ; mandataire liquidateur : Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36, rue des Jardins, 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin
23/02/2012
Voir →
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain
Dépôt de l'état des créances Loi de 1985 — Avis de dépôt de l'état des créances, dépôt de l'état des créances au Tribunal de Grande Instance de Metz où les réclamations seront recevables dans un délai de quinze jours à compter de la présente publication
04/08/2008
Voir →
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude
Jugement d'ouverture de liquidation judiciaire — Jugement prononçant la liquidation judiciaire ; insolvabilité notoire fixée au 24 octobre 2005 ; mandataire judiciaire à la liquidation : La SELARL ETUDE GANGLOFF & NARDI prise en la personne de Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36 rue des Jardins 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin
22/05/2008
Voir →