CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230948

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2024

17 janvier 2024

The applicant complains, relying on Articles 6 § 1 and 7 of the Convention, that the domestic courts established the date when the criminal offence of receiving a bribe was committed contrary to the relevant

Source officielle

Page 14 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109493

Admin. suprême

2 janvier 2012

2 janvier 2012

The applicant emphasised that the practice of strip searches was contrary to the Convention by referring to the Court’s case-law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003731297

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

  The applicant finally complains that the decision not to allow him to reside in the Netherlands constitutes treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179676

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2017

1 décembre 2017

As a result, the applicant’s first daughter was registered by a civil status officer as bearing her father’s family name, contrary to the parents’ wishes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412DEC005139299

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2001

12 avril 2001

  The first applicant also complains that the refusal to prolong his residence permit is contrary to his rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 7. THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0906DEC001791691

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 1991

6 septembre 1991

  He also alleges that he suffered inhuman and degrading treatment, contrary to Article 3 of the Convention, and that he had no effective remedy for his complaints, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000034604

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

This in itself does not deserve praise, since acting to the contrary would have been openly unlawful. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13102

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2021

21 janvier 2021

There had also been an administrative practice contrary to Article 5 as regards their arbitrary detention. Conclusion : violation (unanimously).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218000

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2022

23 mai 2022

  Were the measures imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by these provisions, contrary

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68419-68887

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1999

8 juillet 1999

In a judgment of 28   January 1993 the National Security Court convicted Mr Arslan of making propaganda against the “indivisibility of the State” contrary to section 8 of Law no. 3713 and sentenced

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111017

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2012

27 mars 2012

    Was there a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his privacy, home and correspondence, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention with respect to the police inspection of the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203056

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2020

25 mai 2020

QUESTION Do the conditions of the Safi detention facility, were the applicant is detained, amount to inhuman or degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 (see for example, Abdi Mahamud v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198460

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2019

16 octobre 2019

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article   10 of the Convention (see Guja v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187779

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2018

23 octobre 2018

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of his political views, contrary to Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0305DEC001675190

Admin. suprême

5 mars 1991

5 mars 1991

  He alleges that he was not informed promptly of any charge against him, i.e. until 11 October 1985, contrary to Article 5 para. 2 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68352-68820

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2001

30 janvier 2001

She also complained that this treatment was so serious that it amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 and that she had no effective remedy, as guaranteed by Article 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0213DEC001384802

Admin. suprême

13 février 2003

13 février 2003

    The applicants also complain that they are not able to obtain any compensation for their destroyed property contrary to Article 1 of Protocol   No. 1. THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221294

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2022

28 octobre 2022

In addition, the applicants in applications nos. 48619/13, 38570/15, 48492/18, 2672/16, 2712/16, 72577/17, 7865/19 complain that their detention was contrary to Article 5 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209219

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2021

15 mars 2021

    Have the applicants suffered discrimination on the ground of “language” and/or “association with a national minority” and/or “other status”, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC003345696

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1998

14 janvier 1998

had an unfair advantage in the purchase, contrary to Ministry of Finance Directive No. 10/1964.

Source officielle