CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 mai 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 13 September 2019 and 11 December 2019 Published on 15 June 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 6865/19 Joseph FEILAZOO against Malta lodged on 19 August 2019   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Do the conditions of the Safi detention facility, were the applicant is detained, amount to inhuman or degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 (see for example, Abdi Mahamud v. Malta , no. 56796/13, 3 May 2016 and Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, 20 October 2016)?