Dely La République mande et ordonne au ministre de l’intérieur en ce qui le concerne ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties

Délibéré après l’audience du 2 décembre 2025, à laquelle siégeaient : - Mme Dely, présidente, - M. Breton, premier conseiller, - M. Bastian, conseiller.

Délibéré après l'audience du 23 novembre 2023, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Dely, présidente, Mme Fejérdy, première conseillère, M. de Miguel, premier conseiller.

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Dely, présidente du tribunal ; - et les observations de Me Bouhart, représentant Mme C, absente, qui conclut aux mêmes fins que

Dely La République mande et ordonne au préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis en ce qui le concerne ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties

They further argued that the Constitutional Court's finding had had a preventive effect, as no further delays had occurred in the subsequent period. 25.

On 9 September 1998 that court stated that the delay had been caused by the police’s failure to enforce the order.

Thus this period of delay cannot be attributed to the applicant. 45.

On 27 February 1995 the applicant complained to the President of the Warsaw Court of Appeal ( Sąd Apelacyjny ) about – in his words – “an exceptional delay in the proceedings”.

Furthermore, delays occurred while the national courts settled disputes of jurisdiction.

    On 21 September 2005 the Constitutional Court dismissed a part of the applicant’s complaint concerning the delays in the proceedings before the Supreme Court as being belated.

As it turned out eventually, the procedure was inapplicable, which rendered the delays incurred unjustified.

In total these delays protracted the impugned proceedings to one year and six months approximately.

    Proceedings concerning the claim for non-pecuniary damages on account of the alleged delays in the above proceedings (P   771/2007 ‑ III) 33.

    The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v.   Russia , no.

It considered that the delay was caused, inter alia , by his illness and witnesses’ failure to attend hearings.

By letters of 26 February and 21 May 1998 the applicant protested against the delays in the proceedings.

On 7 July 1999 the court appointed a road traffic expert and awarded him a delay of thirty days to produce an expert opinion.

    A prior objection to delay before the trial court is a prerequisite for a subsequent compensation claim.