CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 766 résultats pour « Geismann »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CAA

2ème chambre

DCA_22TL22590_20231114

Admin. Appel

14 novembre 2023

14 novembre 2023

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente rapporteure a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Source officielle

Page 103 sur 339

← PrécédentSuivant →
CAA

2ème chambre

DCA_22TL22591_20231114

Admin. Appel

14 novembre 2023

14 novembre 2023

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente rapporteure a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Source officielle
CAA

2ème chambre

DCA_22TL21353_20230926

Admin. Appel

26 septembre 2023

26 septembre 2023

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente rapporteure, a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-976708-1007636

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2004

8 avril 2004

    Principal facts   The applicants, Cornelia and Josef Haase, are German nationals, born respectively in 1968 and 1967 and living in Altenberge (Germany).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD003963009

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2012

13 décembre 2012

    Germany ............................................. 17 (a)     Investigation by the German prosecuting authorities ..... 17 (b)     German parliamentary inquiry ....

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0518DEC001421988

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1992

18 mai 1992

  His claim can therefore only be based on the decisions of the German courts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0509DEC004254102

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2007

9 mai 2007

observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Jürgen Schenk, is a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201JUD002320508

Admin. suprême

1 février 2011

1 février 2011

    By an international letter of request, the court sought information from the German social services about the applicant’s social and financial circumstances. 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1013DEC003229902

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2005

13 octobre 2005

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article   8 of the Convention that the decision of the German courts not to grant him access to his daughter F.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0908DEC007147701

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2005

8 septembre 2005

He argued that the compulsory insurance violated his right to equal treatment as guaranteed by Article 3 of the German Basic Law.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2055934-2175704

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2007

29 juin 2007

  A delegation of three Court Judges – Rait Maruste (Estonian), Renate Jaeger (German) and Volodymyr   Butkevych (Ukrainian) – took evidence from witnesses in Khmelnytsky (Ukraine) from Monday

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56105

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2002

22 juillet 2002

Convention to abide by it; Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent state indicated that the Court’s judgment had been published in German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163514

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2016

9 mai 2016

page-break-after:avoid }   Communicated on 9 May 2016   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 67976/11 Muzzafer DEMIR against Germany lodged on 28 October 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant, a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1535

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2009

12 mai 2009

The applicants then brought an action in the administrative courts which was ultimately dismissed, after the courts concluded that in respect of the critical values on respirable dust emissions the German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC003771106

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

Thomas Minth and Ms Rosina Minth, German nationals who were born in 1941 and 1940 respectively and live in   Leonberg, Germany.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2791743-3053841

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2009

2 juillet 2009

#xa0; 540 02.07.2009   Press release issued by the Registrar   Election at the European Court of Human Rights     The European Court of Human Rights has elected Renate Jaeger (a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49289

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 1989

10 novembre 1989

henceforth, in criminal proceedings or in court proceedings under the Regulatory Offences Act, interpretation costs shall be payable by an accused or other person concerned who does not understand German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179361

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2017

14 novembre 2017

14 November 2017   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 63258/17 Heinrich Hermann KLATT against Germany lodged on 24 August 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF the CASE The application concerns the refusal of the German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13115

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2021

12 janvier 2021

The German Government subsequently published a press release stating that tests carried out on the applicant revealed the presence of a chemical nerve agent from the Novichok group, which constituted a

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0306DEC003847303

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2018

6 mars 2018

    The applicant, Mrs Edith Mindl, is a German national, who was born in 1943 and lives in Nurnberg. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms C.

Source officielle