with respect to the offence of excessive use of force and within the context of counter terrorism operations, lack of thoroughness in investigations, lenient attitude of the domestic courts towards state

Rights in the case Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov against Ukraine and of 386 cases against Ukraine concerning the failure or serious delay in abiding by final domestic courts’ decisions delivered against the state

the European Court;   Noting with deepest regret, despite the Committee’s previous indications, the persistent lack of information on the concrete measures taken or envisaged by the respondent State

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State

the authorities to sufficiently amend the Bill to allay the concerns about compatibility with the European Convention, including by addressing the following key issues: ensuring that the Secretary of State

opposing the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, in clear and blatant violation of their right to spontaneous assemblies; Reaffirming the unconditional obligation of every respondent State

of Human Rights Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov against Ukraine and of 386 cases against Ukraine concerning the failure or serious delay in abiding by final domestic courts’ decisions delivered against the state

allegedly died in a maternity ward in 1983 three days after his birth;   Recalling further that, in view of the significant number of potential applicants, the European Court held that “the respondent State

the authorities to establish, without further delay, a specific preventive remedy, in accordance with the requirements of the Convention, by drawing inspiration from existing remedies in other member States

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State

level so that Lithuania can comply with its obligations under the European Convention;   RECALLED in this respect the recent commitments made at the highest level, notably by a number of senior State

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

judgments in his contacts with the United Kingdom authorities, calling on them to take the measures necessary to amend the blanket ban on prisoner voting and encouraged the authorities of the member States

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

that the introduction of measures to address the excessive length of proceedings contributes, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, to enhancing the protection of human rights in member States

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State