26111/02, § 88, ECHR 2006 ‑ I (extracts); Rasmussen , cited above §   41, and Shofman v. Russia , no. 74826/01, § 39, 24 November 2009). 23.

    According to the first applicant, the real reason for the institution of the proceedings against him was his perceived membership of Milli Shura. 9.

Malta, cited above, § 111) or exceptions to the application of a time-limit in situations where a person becomes aware of the biological reality after the time-limit has expired (see Shofman v.

situations where the putative father became aware of the biological reality only after the expiry of the time-limit, did the Respondent State secure to the applicant the respect for his private life (see Shofman

Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Liliya Gamirovna Nizamiyeva, is a Russian national who was born in 1960 and lives in the village of Sharan in the Bashkortostan Republic

RG 22/00305 - N° Portalis DB22-W-B7G-QQZN Code NAC : 88L DEMANDEUR : S.A. [9] [Adresse 2] [Localité 6] représentée par Me Guillaume BREDON, avocat au barreau de PARIS, substitué par Me Nathan SHARMA

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire complémentaire, enregistrés respectivement les 18 août, et 23 décembre 2022, Mme B A C, représentée par Me Al-Shaman, demande au tribunal :

A..., représenté par Me Al-Shaman, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 7 juin 2024 par lequel le préfet de Seine-et-Marne a refusé de lui délivrer un titre de séjour, l’a obligé à quitter

Azerbaïdjan 21/04/2016 Vahid Turab oglu KARIMOV 1987 Baku Akram Shirvan oglu HASANOV 2. 56908/16 Abbasov c.

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 74826/01 by Leonid SHOFMAN

  Shofman v. Russia (no. 74826/01) The applicant, Leonid Mikhaylovich Shofman, is a German national who was born in 1957 and lives in Gross-Rohrheim (Germany).

In general, it is primarily for the State concerned to choose the means to be used in its domestic legal order in order to discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention (see Shofman

On 14 March 2003 the Shumen Regional Court found that as the applicant's detention pending the final judgment had exceeded his sentence by one year and four months, damages were due under item 6 of section

SHARMA-FOKEER Copies exécutoires délivrées le : 08/04/2024 à : - Me A. JACQUIN - Me E.

Malta, cited above, §   111) or exceptions to the application of a time-limit in situations where a person becomes aware of the biological reality after the time-limit has expired (see Shofman v.

d'être représentée à l'audience INTIMEE S.A.S. [3], demeurant [Adresse 2] représentée par Me Guillaume BREDON de la SAS BREDON AVOCAT, avocat au barreau de PARIS substituée par Me Rajeev SHARMA-FOKEER

of September 2016, the applicant made a publication in the social media saying that he would participate in the demonstration scheduled for 11 September 2016 by the opposition political union Milli Shura

Sherman, avocat au barreau de Londres, et par M me Nuala Mole, du centre AIRE (Londres).

Bulgarie (n o 37770/03)* Le requérant, Bilyan Marinov, est un ressortissant bulgare né en 1984 et résidant à Shumen (Bulgarie).