The applicants, whose domestic complaints had been declared statute ‑ barred because they had been lodged after 27 October 2009, challenged these domestic decisions.

The abrasion on the applicant’s right forearm had originated from an impact with a hard blunt object.

However, the wound had not healed until in April she returned to the hospital to have the shrapnel removed. For 21 days following the injury, the applicant underwent hospital treatment.

also several incidents which had immediately preceded those hostilities.

Slovenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   J. Hedigan, President,   Mr   B.M. Zupančič,   Mr   V.

    The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

Both victims had multiple shrapnel wounds. Due to intense fighting in Hostomel, an ambulance could not reach the applicants.

It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Chamber of the Court in

It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Chamber of the Court in

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings before the national courts had not been concluded within a reasonable time.

It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Chamber of the Court in

in that judgment had related to the specific facts of that case.

It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Chamber of the Court in

It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Chamber of the Court in

encrypted messaging application “ByLock”, which the domestic courts held was used exclusively by FETÖ/PDY members and which therefore constituted sufficient evidence to prove on its own that a person had

is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place is currently under consideration and will be decided by the Grand Chamber

The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

It is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place has been examined and decided by the Grand Chamber of the Court in