On 21 July 2003 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court contesting all the prerequisites of Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the

    On 24 July 2006 the Constitutional Court, in a case in which it examined jointly two constitutional complaints ( skarga konstytucyjna) lodged by former detainees, declared Article 263 § 4

from Article 263 § 4 read in conjunction with Article 263 §§ 2 and 3 of the 1997 Code concerns only situations where no first judgment has yet been given at first instance.”

    On 24 July 2006 the Polish Constitutional Court, having examined jointly two constitutional complaints ( skarga konstytucyjna) lodged by former detainees, declared Article 263 § 4 of the

They maintained that the applicant could have filed a constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court alleging that Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allowed the extension

    Statutory time-limits for detention on remand (a)     Article 263 73.     Article 263 §§ 3 and 4 of the Code provided at the material time: “3.

    On 24 July 2006 the Constitutional Court, having examined jointly two constitutional complaints ( skarga konstytucyjna ) lodged by former detainees, declared Article 263 § 4 of the Code of

On 26 October 1998 the Regional Court made an application under Article 263 § 4 22 § 4 of the so-called “New Code of Criminal Procedure” of 1997 (“the 1997 Code”), which entered into force on 1 September

    On 24 July 2006 the Polish Constitutional Court, having examined jointly two constitutional complaints ( skarga konstytucyjna) lodged by former detainees, declared Article 263 § 4 of the

    On 14 June 2002 the District Court made an application to the Katowice Court of Appeal ( Sąd Apelacyjny ) pursuant to Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ( Kodeks postępowania

It further found that the prolongation of the applicant’s detention beyond the statutory 2 years’ time-limit was justified under Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the complexity of the

It considered that the case was “particularly complex” within the meaning of Article 263 § 4 of the Code. 9.

    On 26 October 1998 the Warsaw Regional Court made an application under Article 263 § 4 of the so-called “New Code of Criminal Procedure” of 1997 (“the 1997 Code”), which entered into force

SK 58/03), the Polish Constitutional Court, having examined a constitutional complaint on the length of detention on remand, ruled that the provision of Article 263§4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

It also considered that the case was particularly complex within the meaning of Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 14.

In addition to the grounds previously invoked, the Court of Appeal found that the prolongation of detention was justified under Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the particular complexity

In addition to the grounds previously invoked, the Court of Appeal found that the prolongation of detention was justified under Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the particular complexity

et 5 de l’article 263 du code rural.

L. 263-2 et L. 233-4 du Code du travail et non un quelconque état de récidive nécessaire aux termes de l'article L. 263-4 du Code du travail pour que le prévenu puisse être condamné à une peine privative