CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Pôle 1 - Chambre 9
65a23e9d7ca18b0008e58327
11 janvier 2024
Décision du 10 mai 2022 - Bâtonnier de l'ordre des avocats de Paris - RG n° 211/351317 Vu le recours formé par : Monsieur [O] [K] Sarl restaurant [5] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représenté par Me Seydou
Page 1 sur 3
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD001841410
11 octobre 2011
By a decision of 10 June 2009 the Kaluga District Court, Kaluga Region, remanded the applicant in custody pending extradition.
3e chambre
5fd940f81c0e822756a68b8e
19 mars 2020
C/ SARL KALIKA VOYAGES ...
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209DEC000303803
9 février 2010
On 10 December 1999 the Kaluga District Court of the Kaluga Region confirmed the lawfulness of the applicant's arrest, noting that: “[The applicant] is charged with a serious offence which carries
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2798209-3069781
16 juillet 2009
In addition, Ms Wojtas-Kaleta signed an open letter in protest against the above measure.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD000245004
9 avril 2009
The period of detention during the investigation may be extended beyond six months only if the detainee is charged with a serious or particularly serious criminal offence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004008114
15 octobre 2015
On 11 June 2014 the Kaluga FMS wrote to the Kaluga regional ombudsman, noting that on 27 May 2014 the Regional Court had rejected the applicants’ appeals (see paragraph 13 above) while they
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503JUD003002402
3 mai 2011
On 29 June 2000 the Kaluga District Court of the Kaluga Region rejected the application as unfounded.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC003002402
8 juillet 2008
He resided in Obninsk, Kaluga Region. 1.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-191317
28 janvier 2019
31103/16 23/05/2016 Vyacheslav Anatolyevich NIKOLAYEV 27/05/1971 Kaluga Russian Kaluga Regional Court 06/11/2014 (appeal decision, entered into force on the same date) “the Housing
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1212DEC007775516
12 décembre 2019
the Tatarstan Republic 2 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 2 day(s) 74270/17 11/10/2017 Vage Ashotovich Parazyan 02/05/1989 Bordushko Olga Aleksandrovna Moscow 01/12/2016 to 04/05/2018 Kaluga
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0602DEC004859917
2 juin 2022
reasonable suspicion of their involvement in aggravated and/or violent offences, the vulnerability of the victims, the complexity of the criminal cases against the applicants and the existence of a serious
ECLI:CEDH:003-2690149-2931246
Russia (no. 2450/04) The applicant, Aleksey Kondratyev, is a Russian national who was born in 1977 and is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence in Kaluga (Russia) for firearms trafficking and aggravated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001840391
24 août 1999
The facts of the case as they have been submitted by the applicant can be summarised as follows: The applicant lived with her family in Kalogrea, a village in the District of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220DEC002885417
20 février 2024
:135.42pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 28854/17 Kalina
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD006103409
6 octobre 2016
It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840391
27 janvier 2009
The applicant lived with her family in Kalogrea, a village in the District of Kyrenia.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2184337-2322740
15 novembre 2007
Attempts to enforce that judgment were unsuccessful: when the Tula police units moved out, other police units from Kaluga moved in and the applicant was prevented from entering his property by trenches
ECLI:CEDH:001-196783
19 septembre 2019
The applicant was born on 13 July 1986 and lives in the Kaluga region.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD000622809
24 avril 2014
On 1 July 2008 the Kaluga Regional Court upheld the first-instance judgment.