, sans être, tout comme la SAS Escurial, pour autant, gérants de la société civile immobilière Atar » et confirment « sa transmission entre la « société civile immobilière » Atar et la société civile immobilière

The prosecutor also stated that a list of the items which the tenth applicant had been supplying to the terrorist organisation had been included in the indictment. 33.

01/04/1965 Mardin   Nihad ATAY 08/08/1968   Hidayet ATAY 10/06/1975   Fatma ATAY 01/01/1955 Mardin   Abdullah ATAY 01/09/1975 Mardin   Nurullah ATAY 01/09/1980 Mardin   Emrullah

On 9 November 2007 Rıza Çiçek made statements before the Hozat Magistrates’ Court, having been accused of membership of a terrorist organisation by the Hozat public prosecutor.

  The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which EUR 2,286.74 is to be paid for any damage and for costs and expenses. (The judgment is available only in French.)

    The applications mainly concern the applicants’ conviction for membership of an armed terrorist organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kabasakal and Atar v.

Vu la requête, enregistrée le 3 décembre 2012 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par la SAS PHB Distribution, dont le siège est 1903 rue Pierre Loti Domaine de Salle à Bouc-Bel-Air

applicant organisation and additional premises that could be made available to the applicant organisation. 17.

It follows that this part of the application has been introduced out of time and must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. 2.

No other grounds for declaring it inadmissible have been established.

  Lastly, the Court considered that Turkey could not be said to have conducted an effective criminal investigation and therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 13.

It considered that period to be excessive and in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement, and held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Civil Procedure (‘COCP’) for him to be admitted to the benefit of juratory caution (an exemption from paying the security for costs which can be given by the court subject to conditions).

He further complained that there was nothing to indicate that he was part of an illegal organisation and that therefore Article 168 should not have been applied to him. 17.

  60908/11, 62110/11, 62129/11 and 62312/11 and Mr Attard had been constantly and intensively exposed to asbestos during their employment.

  The Court further considered that the investigation that had been conducted had not been thorough and effective as required by Article 3.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

En juillet 1997, il arriva au Danemark avec sa sœur et sa mère   ; celle-ci déposa pour la famille une demande d’asile en alléguant avoir été un membre actif d’une organisation opposée au gouvernement