Accordingly, the case, insofar as it concerns Marija Mlakar, should be struck out of the list. B.     As to the victim status of Drago Mlakar 14.

Ils soutiennent que : - Mme C n'a pas pu consulter les documents liés à cette délibération en violation de son droit à l'information ; - l'association " MLPA la Roue " a bénéficié d'une subvention

His wife, Jelka Taljat, and his daughter, Tina Taljat Mlakar, expressed their wish to continue the proceedings before the Court in his stead in the capacity of the applicant’s heirs.

  The case is pending before the Mlawa District Court.   On 25 May 1994 this Court refused legal aid to the applicant.

Malhous et deux personnes morales mais, après une audience en présence des parties, le bureau foncier de Mladà Boleslav refusa de les entériner par deux décisions administratives. M.

Kincl Mlakar, a lawyer practising in Šmarje pri Jelšah.

Jadrijević Mladar. The Government submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the case. These observations were then forwarded to the applicant’s representative, Mr Z.

Jadrijević Mladar, submitted their further observations.

A B, ressortissant polonais né le 13 mars 1983 à Mlawa (Pologne) demande l'annulation de l'arrêté du 31 juillet 2022 par lequel le préfet de Maine-et-Loire l'a obligé à quitter le territoire français sans

Gracia, - les conclusions de Mme Beugelmans-Lagane, rapporteure publique ; - et les observations de Me Mlapa, représentant la Fondation des Petits frères des pauvres, le directeur de la DRIEETS d'Île-de-France

Par deux décisions du 12 octobre 1994, le bureau foncier ( pozemkový úřad ) de Mladá Boleslav (ci-après   : «   le bureau foncier   ») refusa de les entériner.

Jadrijević Mladar. 3.

  Jadrijević Mladar. 4.

Jadrijević Mladar. 3.     The case concerns a request for the applicants’ extradition to the United States of America.

  Jadrijević Mladar. 3.

Jadrijević Mladar, and to declare the remainder of the application inadmissible; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 1 February 2022, Delivers the following judgment, which was

Jadrijević Mladar; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

Jadrijević Mladar; the decision of the Bulgarian Government not to make use of their right to intervene in the proceedings (Article   36§   1 of the Convention); the parties’ observations; Having

  Jadrijević Mladar, Representative of Serbia to the European Court of Human Rights, and to declare the remainder of the application inadmissible; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides

Jadrijević Mladar; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.