LABORATOIRE GREENVET INFIRMATION PARTIELLE Grosse délivrée le 14 4 23 à Me DAATSELAAR Me CANNET REPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE AU NOM

A decision delivered on an appeal in the interests of the law cannot alter the outcome of cases already decided. 10.

A decision delivered on an appeal in the interests of the law cannot alter the outcome of cases already decided. COMPLAINTS 10.

DOBRILĂ against Romania and Dana Maria VODISLAV against Romania lodged on 1 September 2015 and 10 September 2015 respectively STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant in the first case, Ms Daniela Dobrilă, is

the Slovak Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 22 May 2023 by two Slovak nationals, Ms Daniela

In the present cases, after having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court considers that for various reasons, enumerated below, the State cannot be held liable for the non-enforcement or

Q uesada , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 November 2000, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mrs Daniela Capellini, is an Italian

Following his death in November 2015, his niece, Ms Daniela Antanasković, expressed her wish to pursue the application. The applicant was represented by Mr G. Cvetić, a lawyer practising in Belgrade.

The applicant in the second case, Ms Daniela Badea, is a Romanian national, who was born in 1966 and lives in Rome, Italy. They were represented before the Court by Mr I.

width:18.78pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 30363/15 and 30405/15 Ovidiu POPESCU against Romania and Daniela

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 59634/00 by Daniela

In the present cases, after having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court considers that the State cannot be held liable for the non ‑ compliance with the “reasonable time” requirement

The former Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Cassation have held that those who have lost employment competitions cannot challenge those competitions in the civil courts.

A decision delivered on an appeal in the interests of the law cannot alter the outcome of cases already decided. 10.

/1955 Ștefana BUF 20/02/1959 Ionica BUZOIANU 29/08/1965 Victor BUZOIANU 01/04/1957 Costel CĂLIN 03/06/1953 Elena CANCIU 16/01/1961 Gheorghe CANCIU 19/01/1958 Lilica Marinela CANCIU 06/06/1971 Ghiță CANDET

s5A65B3DC { width:46.56pt; display:inline-block } .sD49C56F { width:262.16pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION   DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF   Application no. 31012/96 by Daniela

Romania (just satisfaction), no. 1193/08, § 15, 3 March 2015), the Court considers that the amount awarded to the applicant cannot be regarded as unreasonable. 7 .

Jean-Louis Z..., pressé de s'en débarrasser car rentrant en Belgique, que pour « King » il avait récupéré seulement le carnet d'origine, en l'absence de certificat de propriété dont M.

Nikolaeva FARTUNOVA and Petko Borisov KOLENICHEV against Bulgaria lodged on 4 June 2012 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants, Ms Daniela Nikolaeva Fartunova and Mr Petko Borisov Kolenichev, are Bulgarian

width:143.76pt; display:inline-block } .s325F4266 { width:44.89pt; display:inline-block } .sC5094F1B { width:100.74pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 8115/15 Daniela