CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
3e chambre sociale
6285e1336a1876057df5d35c
18 mai 2022
Localité 4] Représentant : Me Yann LE TARGAT de la SEP ALAIN ARMANDET ET YANN LE TARGAT, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER INTIMEE : Madame [V] [B] [Adresse 2] [Localité 1] Représentant : Me Aude
Page 1 sur 28
1re chambre civile
63d8c0902182c005de24d1c8
4 août 2022
Entre : D'UNE PART : Monsieur [N] [R] [Adresse 3] [Adresse 3] [Localité 2] Représenté par Maître Aude WIDUCH, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER et D'AUTRE PART : L'AGENT JUDICIAIRE
1ère Chambre C
5fda62763e10ffab32f05a59
9 juillet 2019
Jugement du 14 JUIN 2016 TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE MONTPELLIER N° RG 14/01377 APPELANTE : SARL ACCESS GLOBAL SECURITY [Adresse 1], [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] Représentée par Me Aude
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0720JUD007462801
20 juillet 2004
:35.21pt; display:inline-block } .s1F330D22 { width:218.14pt; display:inline-block } .s50892CF2 { width:19.21pt; display:inline-block } .sF290579F { width:234.81pt; display:inline-block }
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-242795
18 mars 2025
; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s1237796D { width:21.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9A9FB596 { width:19.46%; border:0.75pt solid
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1026JUD002892309
26 octobre 2017
:6.53pt; display:inline-block } .s5E0D12F4 { width:155.86pt; display:inline-block } .sAAF48370 { width:22.55pt; display:inline-block } .sD349321E { width:216.9pt; display:inline-block } .s68C46B95 { margin-top
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022DEC000102219
22 octobre 2024
:24.22pt; display:inline-block } .s930DD00E { width:137.1pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .sD00444C6 { margin-top
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630DEC005063307
30 juin 2016
:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .s82B56815 { width:201.76pt; display:inline-block } .s294F11C8 { width:3.2pt; display:inline-block } .sE64049FF { width:213.1pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top
ECLI:CEDH:001-116002
18 décembre 2012
} .sDCE17C84 { width:13.86%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-99492
3 juin 2010
margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFB5BB313 { width
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0116JUD004120821
16 janvier 2025
:20.21pt; display:inline-block } .s7C2BCC70 { width:136.09pt; display:inline-block } .sAD28297D { width:50.9pt; display:inline-block } .s5AC41B6 { width:178.11pt; display:inline-block } CINQUIÈME
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD001942104
15 janvier 2009
:8.93pt; display:inline-block } .s5AA04E69 { width:166.62pt; display:inline-block } .s893551A7 { width:37.61pt; display:inline-block } .s6468F78D { width:209.31pt; display:inline-block }
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-99634
margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s2F9A9989 { width
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-68755-69223
6 mars 2001
:135.36pt; display:inline-block } .sD53C06CC { width:128.69pt; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s75E6A93A { width:13.33pt; display:inline-block } .sC82851F0
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC003189305
20 octobre 2009
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0702JUD002882013
2 juillet 2020
:180.29pt; display:inline-block } .s294F11C8 { width:3.2pt; display:inline-block } .s6F75C96F { width:209.76pt; display:inline-block } .sE50A8DF2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt
PRESS;HEARINGS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2332049-2523304
30 avril 2008
vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s69BE285C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:85.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-85.05pt } .s3A17B00E { width
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC003805907
4 mai 2010
:176.94pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630DEC000840211
:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .s82B56815 { width:201.76pt; display:inline-block } .s294F11C8 { width:3.2pt; display:inline-block } .sE64049FF { width:213.1pt; display:inline-block } PREMIÈRE
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0905DEC004637099
5 septembre 2000
{ font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sFEE8C148 { width:13.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7F0CA1BB { width:1.68pt; display:inline-block } .s2CA41382 { width:8.76pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B