2022 accordée par le bureau d’aide juridictionnelle de [Localité 9]) DEFENDEUR : Monsieur [P] [D] [B] [C] né le [Date naissance 3] 1995 à [Localité 13] [Adresse 8] [Localité 5] représenté par Me Ahmed

comparant en personne, assisté de Me Ahmed AKKAL, avocat au barreau de LYON substitué par Me BAROUKH, avocat au barreau de LYON PARTIES CONVOQUEES LE : 16 Avril 2007 DEBATS EN AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU

Türkiye 26/05/2021 Mevlüt ÖZBAHÇE 1968 İzmir Turkish 273. 30652/21 Akar v. Türkiye 27/05/2021 Murat AKAR Osmaniye Turkish 274. 30679/21 Tüz v.

  1305-1306, §§ 13-16) et Aka c. Turquie (23   septembre 1998, Recueil 1998 ‑ VI, pp. 2674 ‑ 2676, §§ 17-25). EN DROIT I.     JONCTION DES AFFAIRES 10.

of Abdülkadir Akan), Mr Mehmet Akay (born in 1954 and brother of Hasan Akay) and Mr Reşit Acar (born in 1949). 2.

Türkiye 08/05/2024 Selim ÖZKÜL 1949 Kerem ALTIPARMAK 20. 14812/24 Akıl et autres c.

Nine villagers, Reşit Acar, Mehmet Emin Acar, Salih Acar, Ahmet Acar, İbrahim Akan, Yusuf Acar, Erdal Acar Sabri Acar and Semra Akan, were wounded.

Turkey 09/12/2015 Nazım Kara 1966 Istanbul Ahmet Kara 25. 1447/16 Kara v. Turkey 09/12/2015 Hatice Kara 1968 Ankara Ahmet Kara 26. 1451/16 Bayram v.

55227/07 04/12/2007 Mehmet ÇİFTÇİ 01/10/1952 Edirne Fazıl Ahmet TAMER             1328/08 19/12/2007 Mehmet ÇİFTÇİ 01/10/1952 Edirne Fazıl Ahmet TAMER

14/11/1952 Antalya   Ahmet AKKAN 04/02/1950 Antalya   Halil AKKAN 15/10/1963 Antalya   Gülşen BARUT 01/01/1965 Antalya   Salih AKKAN 01/09/1983 Antalya   Musa AKKAN 15/02/1985

, İsmet Acar, Mehmet Ağırman, Abdülkadir Akan, Süleyman Acar and Mehmet Akan.

Türkiye 24/03/2020 Selim GÜRÜLTÜ 1992 Gaziantep Turkish     16976/20 Akar v. Türkiye 18/03/2020 Coşkun AKAR 1983 Adana Turkish Selim YILMAZ   17375/20 Çetin v.

Türkiye 14/10/2022 Cafer KARAKULAH 1971 Kayseri Turkish Özcan AKINCI   49547/22 Akar v. Türkiye 15/08/2022 Fatih AKAR 1979 Istanbul Turkish Emre AKARYILDIZ   50796/22 Erdoğdu v.

    The Court observes that it dismissed a similar preliminary objection in the case of Aka v. Turkey (cited above, pp. 2678-79, §§ 34-37).

Türkiye 07/08/2018       Ahmet SİL 1985 Wagenfeld turc   2. 47674/18 Demirtaş c. Türkiye 28/09/2018     Ali DEMİRTAŞ 1989 Adana turc   3. 49203/18 Akar c.

Date 8276/07 MUSA v. the United Kingdom 19/02/2007 12835/07 NOOR v. the United Kingdom 22/03/2007 26814/07 AHMED v. the United Kingdom 18/06/2007 31363/07 OSMAN v. the United Kingdom 20/07/2007 31669/07

Hakim AKAN, Sait and Abdullah SATAN, Bedir DOMAN, Sait   TEKTAŞ, Bedih and Bedir TEKİNHAN, Turan HARMAN, Hasan   BOZKUŞ, Ahmet AKGEYİK, Feyzi KANLIBAŞ and Emin SAÇAL against Turkey The European

Türkiye 27/10/2020 Mevlüt TORUK 1959 Bolu Turkish Hamdi Kenan SEVİNÇ 139. 50616/20 Akan v. Türkiye 23/10/2020 İsmail Deniz AKAN 1990 Samsun Turkish   140. 50844/20 Abanoz v.

Quant au recours prévu à l’article 105 du code des obligations, elle se réfère à sa conclusion dans l’affaire Aka (arrêt Aka c.