It did not address the alleged lack of “publicity” of the criminal proceedings against the applicant as maintained in his appeal. 37 .

Similarly, Article 330 does not address the issue of the lawfulness of detention.

The Court heard addresses by Mrs Thune, Mr Engzelius and Mr Stabell.   AS TO THE FACTS   I.    PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE   7.

Accordingly, ... it takes effect at the moment it is served on the addressee. [10] Even though an institution’s decision on administrative penalty takes effect at the moment it is served on the addressee

All the above letters were received by the addressee and I retain proof of that. There were no instances of refusal to dispatch letters from prison IK-9.

    The Court heard addresses by Mr Selva, Mr Daniele and Mr Ceccoli.   THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.     The first applicant 10.

where he or she shall be while the certain sports competition is taking place and [for the] two hours after the end of the competition in question. (3)     The address referred to in paragraph

    Merits 1. The Government's submissions 44.

In so far as relevant for the instant case, the letter contained the following questions: “1)     Is [the applicant] known by his stated identity ... at his last known address in Morocco ...

  The Court heard addresses by Mr Fitzgerald, Mr Higgs, Mr Makin, Mr   Sexton and Mr Pannick, and also Mr Pannick's reply to a question put by one of its members. 6.

    Merits 51.

    Accordingly, the Court joins this question to the merits of the complaint. C.     Conclusion 35.

entreprises ; qu'étant poursuivi pour des faits de concussion commis entre le 1er janvier 2005 et le 30 novembre 2007, la prescription n'est pas acquise ; que, par suite, le jugement frappé d'appel mérite

Not long ago... addresses were confiscated from one Moonie... Among them – the address of an American, Patrick Nolan, who passes his time in Rostov, and two e-mail addresses of the CIA.

Moreover, in any case, to the extent that the application contained such personal data as the addresses and telephone numbers of the authors, that information had to be redacted. 32 .

in that text or in the headline had lacked any specific addressee and could not have potentially been a successful call to violence and, as a matter of fact, had not been successful since no violence or

The Minister did not address the circumstances of the applicant’s case but stated that the conduct of the National Security Service had been in compliance with the law.

    The limited scope of the Board’s decision, which was confined to administrative considerations, did not extend to an assessment of the merits of the criminal allegations.

    On 4 August 2010 the Court of Cassation declared the applicant’s appeal on points of law inadmissible for lack of merit.