Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201625
7 février 2020
7 février 2020
During the course of the proceedings, on 10 September 2014, a new paragraph was added to Article 22.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024DEC002024118
24 octobre 2019
24 octobre 2019
The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport on several occasions listed in the appended table, as well as a complaint
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230824
9 janvier 2024
9 janvier 2024
It appears that the conviction was based mainly on the testimonies of five co-defendants (D.S., K.K., M.K., S.M. and D.P.) given during the pre-trial investigation, in the absence of the applicant or his
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244744
8 août 2025
8 août 2025
November 2018 communicated on 8 August 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a dismissal of the applicant from the position of judge assistant on the grounds of her absence from work during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237339
9 septembre 2024
9 septembre 2024
On 28 January 2022 the first-instance court upheld the plaintiffs’ request as regards holding a strike and defined the minimum services to be maintained during the strike days and the applicants held the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC001434409
13 mai 2014
13 mai 2014
The applicant complained under Articles 3 and 5 § 3 of the Convention about the unreasonable length of his pre-trial detention and inadequate living conditions during his detention in the Elbląg Remand
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620DEC000833718
20 juin 2019
20 juin 2019
The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, concerning their ill-treatment during arrest, were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147201
15 septembre 2014
15 septembre 2014
On 9 June 2009 the Ministry of the Interior, acting on the basis of the applicant’s criminal complaint, launched an investigation into his ill ‑ treatment during the dispersal of the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918DEC004356521
18 septembre 2025
18 septembre 2025
The applicant’s complaints under Articles 2 and 13 of the Convention concerning her son’s death during compulsory military service and subsequent investigation were communicated to the Armenian Government
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC005148711
13 mai 2014
13 mai 2014
The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention about the ill-treatment by the police during his arrest after a football match.
Source officielleCHAMBRE 3
DTA_2403047_20260312
12 mars 2026
12 mars 2026
A..., représenté par Me Ducoin, demande au tribunal : 1°) de lui accorder l’aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; 2°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 24 octobre 2024 par lequel le préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4012
24 février 2005
24 février 2005
.) - 26775/02 Decision 24.2.2005 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Complainant’s rights during the pre-trial investigation: inadmissible The
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0828DEC004611520
28 août 2025
28 août 2025
The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport and lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard were communicated
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238625
21 novembre 2024
21 novembre 2024
It also concerns electronic recording and storage of the applicant’s private correspondence in the National Judicial Network System (UYAP) by the authorities during his detention; and the decision of the
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD000231609
17 janvier 2019
17 janvier 2019
The Government did not dispute that force had been used against the applicant during the arrest.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD000997019
30 avril 2026
30 avril 2026
The case concerns the death of the applicant’s brother during compulsory military service, allegedly by suicide, and the subsequent investigation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0224DEC002677502
24 février 2005
24 février 2005
The Court further observes that during the initial investigation there was no evidence to suggest that a crime had been committed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601DEC002092004
1 juin 2010
1 juin 2010
Restrictions on the applicant's right of visit during his detention During the applicant's pre-trial detention, both at the investigation and the trial phase, a certain Polish citizen, Ms
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164859
16 juin 2016
16 juin 2016
Dr F.G. was responsible for the care of the applicant’s wife, Arife Keskin, during her pregnancy.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011DEC000314516
11 octobre 2016
11 octobre 2016
the visits I have observed, occasionally been more active with [X] than during the visits I observed in 2013.
Source officiellePage 99 sur 2399