Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162948
18 avril 2016
18 avril 2016
He also argues that Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was violated because only those dismissed from the public sector are subjected to the tax.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179148
8 novembre 2017
8 novembre 2017
Was there a violation of Article 6 of the Convention because the review application had not been communicated to the applicant and he had not been afforded an adequate opportunity to comment
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186529
6 septembre 2018
6 septembre 2018
The applicant claims that the criminal case against him was fabricated and that he was convicted because of his journalistic activities. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215657
17 janvier 2022
17 janvier 2022
The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Court of Cassation arguing that the appeal proceedings were subject to absolute nullity because the Court of Appeal had proceeded to the reading-out
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176192
10 juillet 2017
10 juillet 2017
He complains under Article 5 of the Convention that his detention was not lawful under domestic law, because it was too long.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227699
1 septembre 2023
1 septembre 2023
The applicant complains of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention because he was allegedly not given an opportunity to acquaint himself with and comment on the information adduced by the police
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162952
18 avril 2016
18 avril 2016
He also argues that Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was violated because only those dismissed from the public sector are subjected to the tax.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162951
18 avril 2016
18 avril 2016
He also argues that Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was violated because only those dismissed from the public sector are subjected to the tax.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208843
22 février 2021
22 février 2021
The applicant complains of a violation of Article 8 of the Convention because of the failure of the Moldovan authorities to take all necessary action, in a timely manner, in order to return the child to
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242799
17 mars 2025
17 mars 2025
Has there been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention because the decision on the award of costs and expenses has not been enforced (see Hornsby v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216620
1 mars 2022
1 mars 2022
Her claim was dismissed after sixteen years because the courts could not establish any malpractice.
Source officiellesoc
6079b0c49ba5988459c501d9
22 juillet 1981
22 juillet 1981
EN QUALITE DE REPRESENTANT SYNDICAL AU COMITE D'ENTREPRISE DE LA SOCIETE LABORATOIRES BEECHAM-SEVIGNE, PUIS A CELUI DE LA COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DE SPECIALITES (CIS), QUI LUI AVAIT ETE POUR PARTIE SUBSTITUEE
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181720
22 février 2018
22 février 2018
her administrative complaint she asked the administrative court to obtain, as evidence, the new regulations, which were adopted by the president of the court and upon which she had been reassigned, because
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Lyon
DTA_2516079_20260303
3 mars 2026
3 mars 2026
B..., représenté par Me Bechaux, conclut à ce que le tribunal liquide l’astreinte prononcée par l’ordonnance du 20 janvier 2026. Vu les autres pièces du dossier.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Lyon
DTA_2500286_20250210
10 février 2025
10 février 2025
A B, représenté par Me Bechaux, demande au juge des référés du tribunal : 1°) d'enjoindre à la préfète du Rhône, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative, de lui fixer
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188017
7 novembre 2018
7 novembre 2018
interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, as a result of his dismissal from the prosecuting authorities because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186951
18 septembre 2018
18 septembre 2018
On 6 September 2012 the Bucharest District Court dismissed her action as inadmissible because she had not paid the required deposit.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178136
28 septembre 2017
28 septembre 2017
Has there been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention, notably because of the conditions of the applicant’s detention and his frequent transfers from one prison to another, considering
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248715
20 janvier 2026
20 janvier 2026
He also complained that the investigation had been ineffective (the procedural limb), notably because it had not been clarified whether entering the observation cell and deploying pepper spray had been
Source officiellesoc
613724d8cd58014677418d5c
21 février 2007
21 février 2007
de responsable des relations hospitalières a été licencié le 29 janvier 2002 pour motif économique par la société Glaxosmithkline, société née de la fusion des sociétés Glaxo Wellcome et Smithkline Beecham
Source officiellePage 99 sur 1499