Meanwhile, in 2003, the applicant lodged a complaint against the officers in charge during his police custody and applied for leave to intervene in the proceedings.

During subsequent interviews, the applicant broke his silence and gave detailed answers admitting his involvement in the bombing.

Commission of Human Rights on 5 August 1991 under Article   25 of the Convention by Mr   Ronald Ribitsch, an Austrian national, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaint that, during

In particular, the need to preserve the applicant’s anonymity could have justified the use of a balaclava during his appearances in public while he was being escorted to the courtroom.

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application mainly concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

According to the applicant, during his detention in that facility, he was unable to take a walk and undertake outdoor exercises in winter time because he was not provided with winter boots, despite his

Georgia - 7224/11 Judgment 8.10.2020 [Section V] Article 14 Discrimination Abusive police conduct during search of premises of an LGBT NGO motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred: violation Article

regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violations established on account of unjustified and excessive force used by members of the security forces during

During the course of his police custody, the applicant complained of having been heavily beaten and subjected to sexual assault by certain police officers.

lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 16 October 1985 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Jean Kruslin, a French national, who complained of telephone tapping carried out during

At a plenary session on 30 April 2013, during a voting process, the first and second applicants showed a billboard in the session hall displaying the text “You steal, you cheat, you lie”.

The applicant further alleges that, especially in the Satu Mare Prison, the toilets were in such an unsanitary condition that they were unfit for use; that during winter it was very cold as the heaters

of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 June 1999 and 15 July 1999, having regard to France’s obligation under former Article 32, paragraph 4, of the Convention to abide by them; Whereas during

1991;     - held that there had been no violation of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4) of the Convention as regards the proceedings relating to the application lodged on 18 December 1992 during

She had stayed in Ukraine during the final months of his life and had not participated in his funeral. The applicant appealed.

In particular, was his health and physical well-being duly protected during his imprisonment, by providing him with prompt and adequate medical care (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of

During the hearing an internal document with information about allegedly reprehensible actions of Mr G. had been read out.

    On 29 November 2012 the Court gave notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning his placement in a metal cage during the court proceedings

    The applicant complains under Article 5 §§ 1-4 of the Convention that he was unlawfully deprived of his liberty for 22 months, during the period from 9 May 2009 to 17 March 2011.