by officers at the centre that the applicant had been deported to Kazakhstan on 12 March 2012. 25.

He pointed out that it followed from the information on the receipts dated 6 March and 26 April 2000 that proceeds had also been generated by such gaming machine.

Zupančič,   Mark Villiger,   Ganna Yudkivska,   Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 8 March 2011, Delivers the following

On 29 March 1999 the applicant requested the Czech Bar Association to assign a lawyer to him.

  65075/01, §   37, 29   March 2006). 49.

    On 8 March 2010 the application was communicated to the Government. 5.

The security forces announced that the march was illegal and requested the participants to disperse. The group started shouting slogans and continued to march.

Kristina Pardalos,   Johannes Silvis,   Valeriu Griţco,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 20 March

They were held, inter alia , on 11 and 12 March, 2 and 17 April, 22 May and 19 June 2011.

Her appeal against this decision was heard by Birmingham Social Security Appeal Tribunal on 12 March 1998, which rejected it on the basis of established case-law.

première instance 16/00625 ARRET DU 11 OCTOBRE 2022 APPELANTE : CAISSE REGIONALE DE CREDIT AGRICOLE MUTUEL DE L'ANJOU ET DU MAINE [Adresse 6] [Localité 5] Représentée par Me Philippe LANGLOIS

He did not possess a good command of the language and had no social links to the country.

    On 16 March 2002 the investigator decided that the applicant was to be detained in the ITT until 19 March 2002, on account of the considerable number of investigative measures yet to be taken

When they had been approached by police officers, some of the applicants “had used obscene language”.

  The President of the Court gave the lawyer in question leave to use the Spanish language (Rule 27 para. 3).   3.

His children spoke Turkish, but would still face language difficulties if they were to attend a Turkish high school.

  Turkey judgment of 23 March 1995 ( preliminary objections ) (Series A no 310), the above-mentioned Loizidou v.

in Lower Saxony have mainly stopped speaking their language. 6.

Often she utters lies and employs defamatory and offensive language.” “It is a pity and I have lost much of my time having to deal with so many and such rough and rude lies and perversions.