Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2469
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
from photocopying medical records: admissible The applicants are eight women of Roma origin who were treated at gynaecological and obstetrics departments in two hospitals in eastern Slovakia during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209138
11 mars 2021
11 mars 2021
During the eight months of his pre-trial detention the applicant was not allowed to receive visits from his family and, in an interview to the national television, the head of the Anticorruption Prosecutor
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205160
14 septembre 2020
14 septembre 2020
CASE The application concerns the period of the applicant’s detention which was not covered by a court decision and the alleged lack of an effective procedure to review the lawfulness of his detention during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174346
18 mai 2017
18 mai 2017
December 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204273
8 juillet 2020
8 juillet 2020
d) of the Convention, about a breach of the principle of equality of arms alleging that he was convicted on the basis of a graphological expert report which was: - obtained by the public prosecutor during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-119390
12 avril 2013
12 avril 2013
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention of ill ‑ treatment by the police during arrest.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4633
25 novembre 2003
25 novembre 2003
On 17 November 2000, the chambre du conseil of the district court declared the prosecution time barred, since no measure of investigation or prosecution had been carried out during the previous three years
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205031
7 septembre 2020
7 septembre 2020
Leonovych SAMSIN against Ukraine lodged on 18 July 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant, at the time a Supreme Court judge, was the chairman of the High Judicial Qualifications Commission during
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6767
23 mars 2000
23 mars 2000
.) - 33945/96 Decision 23.3.2000 [Section IV] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Possessions Refusal of compensation or special allowance for forced labour performed during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207456
16 décembre 2020
16 décembre 2020
applicant complains that the domestic courts convicted him on the basis of unlawful evidence, in particular his pre-trial identification by the injured party ( rekognícia ) and the latter’s testimony given during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242136
27 janvier 2025
27 janvier 2025
(the only eyewitness to the relevant events) who was examined during pre-trial investigation but not during the trial. Application no. 34090/23 Syomak v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173479
28 février 2017
28 février 2017
During the retrial, did the domestic courts rely on valid and sufficient reasons when rejecting the applicant’s request to summon and hear witness A.K., having regard to a final judgment whereby A.K. had
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246113
20 octobre 2025
20 octobre 2025
The applicant is a university professor, who expressed negative views on the professional qualifications and behaviour οf another professor of her department during the latter’s evaluation on 30 June 2010
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231294
1 février 2024
1 février 2024
Application no. 46201/21 Józsefné LIMP against Hungary lodged on 7 September 2021 communicated on 1 February 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229704
27 novembre 2023
27 novembre 2023
SECTION Application no. 50723/21 Sándor JÁMBOR against Hungary lodged on 30 September 2021 communicated on 27 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the right to demonstration during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193419
29 avril 2019
29 avril 2019
However, on 30 October 2012 the constituency electoral commission (ConEC) ordered a recount in thirteen precincts on the grounds that some packages with documents had been damaged during their transportation
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192152
5 mars 2019
5 mars 2019
November 2010 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177706
14 septembre 2017
14 septembre 2017
December 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7453
9 avril 2013
9 avril 2013
During that period, on one occasion the authorities rejected his request to have an additional family visit without justifying their decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10928
6 octobre 2015
6 octobre 2015
That document sets out the main charges where were debated during the proceedings, developed during the deliberations and ultimately formed the basis for the decision to find the applicant guilty as charged
Source officiellePage 97 sur 2399