CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116753
21 janvier 2013
It held that the guardian should accompany the applicant on each and every visit to his child under the schedule determined by that judgment.
Page 97 sur 385
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141136
11 septembre 2013
concerned a violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court in that he was denied the possibility of obtaining a judicial determination of his claim that he was not the biological father of a child
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12714
14 janvier 2020
Lithuania - 10926/09 Judgment 14.1.2020 [Section II] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Political interventions and procedural vagaries to impede court-ordered return of child
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-109681
8 mars 2012
As noted below statutory guidance in relation to child protection and care planning has been recently revised. General Measures 4.
ECLI:CEDH:001-238702
25 novembre 2024
The Juvenile Court also criticised the conduct of the foster family, the guardian of the child, and the experts it had appointed to assist with facilitating the reunification process.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2572513-2789200
2 décembre 2008
Later that day, the doctor alerted the child protection services.
ECLI:CEDH:001-187793
22 octobre 2018
The Town Court had therefore failed to take into account the best interests of the child.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2011:136
10 mars 2011
#Social security for workers - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Scope ratione personae - Interpretation of the term ‘employed person’ - Benefits for a dependent child - Extension of unpaid leave.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13213
8 avril 2021
Judgment 8.4.2021 [GC] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Fine on parent and exclusion of children from preschool for refusal to comply with statutory child vaccination duty: no violation Facts
ECLI:CEDH:002-6924
27 avril 2000
Finland - 25702/94 Judgment 27.4.2000 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Taking of child into care and refusal to terminate care: violation Restrictions on access to child in care
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003201296
31 août 1999
In accordance with section 177 § 1 the solution depended exclusively on the well-being of the child.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0709DEC001332587
9 juillet 1988
the inclusion into Swiss citizenship of the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0921DEC003743797
21 septembre 1999
It further vested custody rights over their minor child with the applicant and obliged her husband to pay maintenance for the child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-212311
15 septembre 2021
J. asked the court to appoint a psychologist to examine the mother and to determine whether she was fit to have custody of the child. 13 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403DEC000540023
3 avril 2025
In August 2018 the applicant sought alternating custody and reduction of the child maintenance. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625DEC002611807
25 juin 2013
The child had to undergo a long series of surgeries and hospitalizations since birth. 4. On 14 January 2006, the child was operated in order to improve his quality and prospect of life.
Cour d'Appel
6253ca3fbd3db21cbdd8a731
5 décembre 2007
demeurant Fleming 11020c 25 SANTIAGO CHILI représenté par Me Louis-Charles HUYGHE, avoué à la Cour assisté de Me Marie-Hélène F..., avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P135, plaidant pour l'association
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0919DEC007440001
19 septembre 2006
Under section 45(2), a court may order that a child be educated in an institution where the education of the child is seriously threatened and where it has been impossible to redress the situation by other
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1118DEC000228422
18 novembre 2025
That interference was in accordance with the law, namely the 1992 Child Welfare Act, which was applicable at the material time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC000821502
14 mars 2006
child.