CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

7 691 résultats pour « Chilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116753

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2013

21 janvier 2013

It held that the guardian should accompany the applicant on each and every visit to his child under the schedule determined by that judgment.

Source officielle

Page 97 sur 385

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141136

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2013

11 septembre 2013

concerned a violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court in that he was denied the possibility of obtaining a judicial determination of his claim that he was not the biological father of a child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12714

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

Lithuania - 10926/09 Judgment 14.1.2020 [Section II] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Political interventions and procedural vagaries to impede court-ordered return of child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-109681

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2012

8 mars 2012

As noted below statutory guidance in relation to child protection and care planning has been recently revised.   General Measures   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238702

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2024

25 novembre 2024

The Juvenile Court also criticised the conduct of the foster family, the guardian of the child, and the experts it had appointed to assist with facilitating the reunification process.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2572513-2789200

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2008

2 décembre 2008

Later that day, the doctor alerted the child protection services.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187793

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2018

22 octobre 2018

The Town Court had therefore failed to take into account the best interests of the child.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2011:136

CJUE

10 mars 2011

10 mars 2011

#Social security for workers - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Scope ratione personae - Interpretation of the term ‘employed person’ - Benefits for a dependent child - Extension of unpaid leave.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13213

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2021

8 avril 2021

Judgment 8.4.2021 [GC] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Fine on parent and exclusion of children from preschool for refusal to comply with statutory child vaccination duty: no violation Facts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6924

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2000

27 avril 2000

Finland - 25702/94 Judgment 27.4.2000 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Taking of child into care and refusal to terminate care: violation Restrictions on access to child in care

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003201296

Admin. suprême

31 août 1999

31 août 1999

In accordance with section 177 § 1 the solution depended exclusively on the well-being of the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0709DEC001332587

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 1988

9 juillet 1988

the inclusion into Swiss citizenship of the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0921DEC003743797

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 1999

21 septembre 1999

It further vested custody rights over their minor child with the applicant and obliged her husband to pay maintenance for the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-212311

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2021

15 septembre 2021

J. asked the court to appoint a psychologist to examine the mother and to determine whether she was fit to have custody of the child. 13 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403DEC000540023

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2025

3 avril 2025

    In August 2018 the applicant sought alternating custody and reduction of the child maintenance. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625DEC002611807

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2013

25 juin 2013

The child had to undergo a long series of surgeries and hospitalizations since birth. 4.     On 14 January 2006, the child was operated in order to improve his quality and prospect of life.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253ca3fbd3db21cbdd8a731

Appel

5 décembre 2007

5 décembre 2007

demeurant Fleming 11020c 25 SANTIAGO CHILI représenté par Me Louis-Charles HUYGHE, avoué à la Cour assisté de Me Marie-Hélène F..., avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P135, plaidant pour l'association

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0919DEC007440001

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2006

19 septembre 2006

Under section 45(2), a court may order that a child be educated in an institution where the education of the child is seriously threatened and where it has been impossible to redress the situation by other

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1118DEC000228422

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2025

18 novembre 2025

That interference was in accordance with the law, namely the 1992 Child Welfare Act, which was applicable at the material time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC000821502

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2006

14 mars 2006

child.

Source officielle