qui leur sont reprochées et de les condamner solidairement à lui payer : - une amende d'un montant total de 3.000 euros, - la somme de 42.613 euros représentant le montant total des droits anti-dumping

During this time, his testicles were squeezed and he received kicks and pressure to his back.

From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during

During the experiment the applicant confirmed again that he did not need a lawyer.

The defendant did not wish to testify; instead, he maintained the statements he had made during the investigations along with those which he had made before the Regional Court during the first trial.

The witnesses confirmed their previous statements during those confrontations. 16.

    In addition, Section 77 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provided that during the pre-trial investigation detention on remand must not exceed two months.

    During the summer of 2010 the applicant resided in Tłokinia Wielka, where he lived on a property belonging to Z.G.

He only knew that they had been withdrawn during the personal search of the applicant.

       During the police interrogations and before the domestic courts, the applicant was assisted by an interpreter.

Lastly, the Director explained that the handcuffs had been necessary due to security concerns and the applicant’s aggressive behaviour during the funeral ceremony. 14.

Also, during the summer, running water had only been available six hours a day and not at all during the night, even if the detainees had needed to use the toilet. 2.     The Government 14.

Principles of nulla poena sine lege and res judicata - Rights of the defence - Attributability of the unlawful conduct - Transfer of liability by means of a statement - Limitation period - Cooperation during

Article 14(2)(b)(i) — Person normally employed in the territory of two or more Member States — Person employed in one Member State and engaged in paid employment on the territory of another Member State during

paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaints concerning the excessive length of his detention on remand and the supervision of his correspondence with his lawyer by the judge during

Despite the expert reports submitted in favour of the applicant during those proceedings, the Diyarbakır Cadastre Court dismissed the applicant’s action but ruled that the applicant should instead bring

Finally, it concerns the absence of the applicant’s lawyer during the impugned search. The applicant alleges a violation of Article 6 of the Convention. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.

In the same judgment, the Assize Court ordered the applicant’s detention ( hükmen tutukluluk ), as he was not detained during the pre-trial proceedings.

Azerbaijan lodged on 5 February 2020 communicated on 23 August 2022   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the death of the applicant’s brother (A.B.), a wanted person, who was killed during