CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006JUD003811403
6 octobre 2009
As a result this restriction applied as a blanket rule and the applicant could not request the benefit of legal assistance during his police custody.
Page 95 sur 2399
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155126
13 mai 2015
During examination in the reception ward signed the consent to treatment.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126DEC003286709
26 novembre 2019
Invoking Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant also alleged that he had been subjected to ill ‑ treatment during his questioning. 4.
ECLI:CEDH:001-122085
4 juin 2013
According to the applicant, he filed a motion with the investigator seeking to be confronted with witnesses V.H., G.A., G.T., K.H., L.T. and O.D who had testified against him during the investigation of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207DEC006630409
7 décembre 2017
They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention during transport.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1324029-1381519
21 avril 2005
The Italian Government subsequently acknowledged that the reports in question had not been produced during the preliminary investigation but during the trial.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13623
5 avril 2022
It had been lawful under Russian law for the applicant to engage in “informing” other voters during an electoral campaign.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14408
26 novembre 2024
Austria - 1718/21 Judgment 26.11.2024 [Section IV] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Effective investigation Death of the applicant’s son during a « heat march » while performing his compulsory
ECLI:CEDH:001-152963
18 février 2015
If I am not mistaken, approximately one and a half months ago, during a conversation he told me that one of his friends had a child that had committed suicide by hanging himself.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0127DEC000087902
27 janvier 2005
She also stated that she had been taken to the hospital on three occasions during her police custody to undergo a gynaecological examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC004879007
27 mai 2014
”; (c) EUR 5,200 to Mr KOZADAYEV for his detention on remand “during 3 years, 2 months and 14 days from 15 September 2006”; (d) EUR 1,800 to Mr LATONIN for his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC003536302
8 juillet 2004
that some of the witnesses be heard during the proceeding again, however, their request was rejected by the court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-205789
5 octobre 2020
In a letter of 13 May 2012 drafted by an investigator dealing with the applicant’s case it is stated that, having watched the video-recording seized from one of the journalists present during the events
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD003047218
7 juillet 2022
The applicant further complained that his pre-trial detention during the period between 28 May 2018 and 22 October 2020 had also been unreasonably long.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1964:0702DEC000212264
2 juillet 1964
During the investigation, which was not completed until April 1964, the Applicant denied his guilt, but fully co-operated with the authorities in their efforts to examine and trace the transactions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD000579705
25 novembre 2010
They noted that all of the applicant’s requests for release, during both the pre-trial investigation stage and the trial, were duly and speedily examined.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003287596
1 juillet 1998
He has had regard to the fact that you used violence during the course of the robbery." B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105DEC003632706
5 novembre 2013
The dormitories were ventilated twice a day: from 8 to 9 a.m. during the morning check, and from 5 to 5.30 p.m. during the evening check. 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412JUD004213606
12 avril 2011
No firearms were found in the prison during the searches carried out in the immediate aftermath of the operation, or during the searches carried out on 12 January, 16 January, 18 January,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0711JUD003469704
11 juillet 2019
During the trial the applicant essentially confirmed his self-incriminating statements.