On 30 April 2010 the Russian Parliament adopted a Federal Law, no.

  In the period from 23 April 2009 to 24 April 2009 he was held for two days in cell 59 alone or with another detainee.

    The applicants’ arrest and charges against them On 2 April 2011 a criminal case was initiated in order to investigate offences allegedly committed during the demonstration of 2 April 2011

  48758/99, §§   34-36, 5 April 2005; and Ryabykh , cited above, §§   51-56). 45.

    The applicant's version of the events of 11 and 12 April 2002 5.

of 19 April 1992).

The application of the special regime was subsequently extended for periods of one or two years, via extension orders issued on 5 April 2007, 3   April 2008, 2 April 2009, 1 April 2010, 20 April 2012

Russia , no. 72780/12, §§ 45-55, 9 April 2015. 34.

    Detention order of 13 April 2005 19.

No investigative activities involving the first applicant were carried out on 19 and 20 April 2004. He was arrested on 24 April 2004 and was immediately provided with a lawyer.

    2 to 27   April 2000, during which period he left the pavilion twice – on 3 and 27 April 2000 – without permission. 13.

She was released on 29   April 1994, having been brought before Prosecutor Osman Yetkin. 23.

    On 28 April 2004 investigator M. decided to seize the X-ray of the applicant’s chest taken at the hospital on 24 April 2004 (see paragraph 32 above). 43.

       As to the reasonable time argument, the Court of Appeal ruled that the applicant had been charged on 2 April 1990, and not on 22   April 1987 as alleged by him, and

the protests had ended on the evening of 7 April 2009.

    The applicant participated at the protests of 6 and 7 April 2009.

    On 30 April 2002 the bank’s enforcement officer set the auction date for 21   May   2002. 10.

On 24   April   2003 the applicant was invited to file his pleading in reply by 23   May   2003.

On 4 April 2005 the Trenčín Regional Court quashed that judgment as the first-instance court had committed errors of law. On 20 April 2007 the District Court decided to obtain an expert opinion.