In a registered letter of 18 April 1985, the applicant informed the tenant that he intended to terminate the lease on expiry of the term on 15 April 1986 and asked him to vacate the premises by that date

On 16 April 2003 the Rostov Regional Court upheld the judgment. The judgment of 22   January 2003 was not executed.

On 1 April 2003 the Ust-Yanskiy District Court of the Sakha (Yakutiya) Republic found for the applicant and awarded her 138,967 Russian roubles (“RUB”).

Following a search on 12   April 2000, they were told they had been arrested and were taken into detention, where they were held until 28 April in unheated, damp cells with no toilets.

On 2 April 1993 the applicant was arrested in Luxembourg, where he then resided. On 6 April 1993 he was extradited to Belgium, where he was placed in detention.

On 4 April 1996 the plaintiff filed a reply. On 18 April 1994 the applicant filed the pleadings. On 9 May 1996 the plaintiff filed additional pleadings.

It appears from the case file that in April 2014 the bill of indictment was sent to the Baku Court of Serious Crimes for trial.

    The Government are requested to provide copies of the following documents: (a)     the report of the forensic medical expert of 1 April 2014; (b)     the trial court’s

On 3 October 2007 the applicant filed a complaint to the prosecutor’s office seeking to set aside the decision of 25 April 2006.

    On 5 April 2007 the investigators suspended the investigation for the failure to identify the perpetrators.

On 14   April   1994 the court accepted their request and ordered the case to be re-opened.

Subsequently, late in the evening of 19   April   2008 the applicant was allowed to leave the prosecutor’s office. 8.

    On 3 April 2008 the Dedovicheskiy District Court of the Pskov Region authorised the investigator to search the flats of the two applicants for a second time.

margin-bottom:6pt } .s4091B0E5 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt }     resolution DH   (99) 124 CONCERNING THE JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF 23 April

In its decision, the investigator referred to the results of the forensic examination of 1 April 2004 (see paragraph 9 above). 12.

On 11 April 1988, the applicant became the owner of the apartment. On 9 June 1989, she served notice on the tenant requiring him to vacate the premises.

    Removal directions were set for 12 April 2000.

On 26 April 2011 the applicant complained of her husband’s purported abduction to the United Nations Human Rights Committee.

The judgment of the Regional Court was executed in full in April 2000.