CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 899 résultats pour « Merrily ADRASSE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0224JUD001441903

Admin. suprême

24 février 2011

24 février 2011

They argued that only U. and T., as legal entities, had been parties to the impugned proceedings, whereas the applicant had acted merely as their legal representative. 56.

Page 92 sur 145

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175325

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2017

17 juin 2017

The Supreme Council’s Resolution of 31 January 1991 did not regulate private life but merely prescribed how the forenames and surnames of citizens of the Republic of Lithuania should be written in the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604JUD000796305

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2013

4 juin 2013

    The Court finds that there is no merit in the Government’s preliminary objection.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169761

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2016

23 novembre 2016

It is clear that Ireland merely stated, without offering further explanation, that the Irish scheme for authorising mollusc farms, including the provisions on consultation, does in fact provide for detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD002353214

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

However, the panels were computer generated, and thus the composition was a merely technical act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0713JUD000873779

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 1983

13 juillet 1983

The Court heard addresses by Mr. Voyame for the Government and by Mr. Sampaio and Mr. Minelli for the Commission, as well as their replies to its questions.   AS TO THE FACTS 6.    Mr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC002004813

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

The only prerequisite for registration was an address. Persons coming from the North Caucasian republics had not had any particular difficulties registering in other parts of Russia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1018DEC001869691

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 1994

18 octobre 1994

It could not be expected from the applicant to remain in custody merely to pursue domestic remedies.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD000787703

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

    Merits 1.     The submissions by the parties 34.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0929JUD000312709

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2011

29 septembre 2011

    Merits 1.     The parties’ arguments 29.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0326JUD000897880

Admin. suprême

26 mars 1985

26 mars 1985

The Court heard addresses by Mr. Korthals Altes for the Government, by Mr. Trechsel for the Commission and by Ms. van Westerlaak and Mr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD003691619

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2025

27 novembre 2025

The Constitutional Court ultimately delivered its decision on the admissibility and merits of the applicant’s case after a period of approximately two and a half years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC001490115

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2020

17 novembre 2020

decision on the “establishment of the public interest in the expropriation” of a given property (see, for example, paragraph 9 above), which was why such a decision had to be notified properly rather than merely

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD000020015

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2019

21 novembre 2019

    The Court observes that in certain countries, such as Austria, importance is attached to academic degrees in general and it is common to address a person with his or her academic degree even

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0710JUD005334199

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2003

10 juillet 2003

    The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115426

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2012

22 novembre 2012

The appeal court held the hearing in the applicant’s absence and did not address the argument pertaining to his absence from the hearing before the Chusovskoy District Court.     6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018JUD000430704

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2007

18 octobre 2007

    The charter of a legal entity shall define the name, address, procedure for management of activities and procedure for liquidation of the legal entity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622JUD001836091

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2010

22 juin 2010

Turkey (merits), no.   16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127574

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2013

26 septembre 2013

If you wish to appeal against the decision, you are to address the appeal to the Administrative Court in [...].

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611DEC003867897

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2002

11 juin 2002

Furthermore, counsel did not address the case-law of domestic courts put forward by the Government but confined himself to repeating his claim that available domestic remedies were theoretical and not

Source officielle