CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 691 résultats pour « Chilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0509DEC004626320

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2023

9 mai 2023

Pending the final outcome of the proceedings (long-term child arrangements), it set Y’s residence with the applicant and granted X contact rights.

Source officielle

Page 92 sur 385

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113DEC003608715

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2018

13 novembre 2018

    The applicant’s actions to have the recognition of a child declared null and void 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-152557

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

She had to carry a suitcase and her youngest child. She complained to the officers, but to no avail. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0413JUD004255908

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2010

13 avril 2010

    The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of a final access order in a pressing child-related matter. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212JUD003585304

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

from the child. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0420JUD003469406

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2010

20 avril 2010

The court made a residence order under which the child was to live with her mother, but the applicant was granted visiting rights, in particular the right to visit his child on given days of the week,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1201DEC002183093

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 1994

1 décembre 1994

The third applicant is the child, born to the second applicant as a result of artificial insemination by a donor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-160000

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2015

16 décembre 2015

On 27 February 2009 the applicant laid criminal information against C.B. for child abduction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC006159515

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

The bill provides the following: If the biological father has shown a sustained interest in the child, he has a right of access to the child if such access is in the child’s best interests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0315REP001257486

Admin. suprême

15 mars 1990

15 mars 1990

  When placing a child in a foster home the normal objective should be the reunification of the natural parents and the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2016

15 novembre 2016

    Convention on the Rights of the Child 64.     The relevant provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child read as follows: Article 3 “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD001806811

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

The photograph had the caption: “One year on [J.N.] has another child.” 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-381

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

Romania - 29032/04 Judgment 27.9.2011 [Section III] Article 3 Positive obligations Failure to effectively apply criminal-law mechanisms to protect child from sexual abuse: no violation   Article 8

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205619

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2020

30 septembre 2020

The judicial or administrative authority may also refuse to order the return of the child if it finds that the child objects to being returned and has attained an age and degree of maturity at which it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10665

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2015

21 juillet 2015

Poland - 63777/09 Judgment 21.7.2015 [Section IV] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Failure to consider father’s parental rights in child abduction case: violation Facts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-838

Admin. suprême

24 août 2010

24 août 2010

.) - 4901/04 Decision 24.8.2010 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Refusal of domestic courts to order mother and child to undergo DNA tests to establish

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5548

Admin. suprême

26 février 2002

26 février 2002

Etat an unrepresented plaintiff who had no opportunity of seeing the submissions of commissaire du Gouvernement : violation Facts : The applicant submitted a request for preliminary leave to adopt a child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13614

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2022

31 mars 2022

However, that fact did not release the authorities from their obligation to protect the child and to take appropriate steps to comply with the positive obligations arising out of Article 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194031

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2019

6 juin 2019

the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations arising from the failure of the domestic courts to apply the principles of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0705DEC001236686

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 1989

5 juillet 1989

  Sari Granström, both at the Institution for Child and Youth Psychiatry in Stockholm (PBU) is appended to the report.

Source officielle