In their observations, the Government submitted that the applicant had been detained in overcrowded cells only on 20 April, 18 and 19 May 2009. 11.

From 7 to 9 April 2012, he was held in a temporary detention facility in Volyn Region. 5.

2016 to 3 a.m. on 7 April 2016 (Ms   Mihu – “the first applicant”) and from 8 a.m. on 6 April 2016 to 4.55 a.m. on 7   April 2016 (Ms Oprea – “the second applicant”).

    Between 16 and 17 April 2003 Se. disappeared. The applicant claimed he had talked to his brother on the phone at around 8 p.m. on 16 April and they had agreed to meet the next day.

    In April 1998 Mr G, the witness who had been with the applicant during the shooting on 22 April 1995, was murdered.

The court found that the applicant had been detained in overcrowded cells from 17 August 2005 to 26 April 2010.

The application concerns a complaint under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention in connection with the alleged failure to be properly served with summons for a hearing before the Supreme Court on 19 April

s47E2B0C6 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   INTERIM resolution DH   (99) 325 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 27584/95 Bertelli AGAINST ITALY (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 April

(confrontation with the applicant and questioning as a suspect of 15-16 April 2005) allegedly obtained under duress (see, mutatis mutandis , Harutyunyan v.   Armenia, no.

On 8 April 1998 Mr Soleimankheel and Mrs Sadat unsuccessfully applied for asylum in the Netherlands.

font-size:7pt } .s79B8843C { margin-top:60pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 13 April

compensation, namely additional 20% compensation under the Presidential Decree of 26 December 2007 (both applications) and compensation for hardship under the Law on Expropriation of Land for State Needs of 20 April

font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 22 April

font-weight:bold } .sD37F5C3B { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 25 April

margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt }       INTERIM resolution DH   (99) 268 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 36484/97 BOZZA AGAINST FRANCE (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 April

AGAINST FRANCE (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 April 1999 at the 666th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention

2025   FIRST SECTION Application no. 4607/24 GENERALI ČESKÁ POJIŠŤOVNA A.S. against Slovakia lodged on 2 February 2024 communicated on 11 April 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns

    Was the applicant deprived of his liberty between 26 April 2021 and 11   May 2021?

By a final decision of 15   April   2020 the Supreme Court refused to recognise the applicant’s continued residency in the apartment in question and dismissed her claim.