Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1113DEC003701803
13 novembre 2006
13 novembre 2006
It appears that this decision was subsequently overturned by the Court of Appeal’s decision of 26 August 1997, by which the inheritance proceedings had been stayed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1127DEC002878002
27 novembre 2006
27 novembre 2006
On 5 August 2002 the additional investigation was completed and the case was referred to the Zhovtnevy District Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117DEC000084202
17 novembre 2005
17 novembre 2005
On 13 August 1999, the District Court held for the applicants. As regards IPC it found that the agency had misread the law, and that the IPC should be 0.7 since 1 February 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160669
12 janvier 2016
12 janvier 2016
On 1 August 2013 the Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s request for leave to appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169587
17 novembre 2016
17 novembre 2016
Criminal proceedings on the fraud charges On 8 August 2012 a criminal investigation was opened into the city’s loss of title to the flat.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-128028
9 octobre 2013
9 octobre 2013
The applicant’s arrest and the alleged ill-treatment by the police At about 10 p.m. on 17 August 2005 the applicant was arrested by the police on suspicion of robbery and murder.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1014DEC004179016
14 octobre 2021
14 octobre 2021
According to the record of that hearing, F.T. had agreed with what the applicant had contended on 19 August 2010 (see paragraph 8 above) and had added that he was the owner of the J.T. company in
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0722JUD002863295
22 juillet 2003
22 juillet 2003
On 31 August 1994 the applicant was interrogated by police officers.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0529DEC004318004
29 mai 2007
29 mai 2007
On 6 August 1996 the applicant was charged with aggravated fraud allegedly committed in 1991.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222DEC002490094
22 février 1995
22 février 1995
After an unsuccessful attempt at leaving the country on 9 August 1991, he left Uganda via Entebbe airport on 18 August 1991.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC002899695
22 octobre 1997
22 octobre 1997
On 21 August 1995 the Lódz Prison Governor upheld this decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC000469813
22 mai 2018
22 mai 2018
In a judgment of 22 August 2012 the Constitutional Court found a violation of the applicant’s above-mentioned rights, relying on the Supreme Court’s above-mentioned decision of 22
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD005352819
5 octobre 2023
5 octobre 2023
During his stay in the alien policing sector, between 9 and 11 August and between 14 and 16 August 2018 (for a total of six days), the applicant was not provided with any food by the Hungarian
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002254193
17 janvier 1996
17 janvier 1996
On 23 August 1990 the applicants were convicted by the Feldkirch Regional Court (Landesgericht) of resisting the forces of the State. Both had confessed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117DEC000085202
17 novembre 2005
17 novembre 2005
On 13 August 1999, the District Court held for the applicants. As regards IPC it found that the agency had misread the law, and that the IPC should be 0.7 since 1 February 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169041
4 novembre 2016
4 novembre 2016
An agreement in this respect was concluded between the applicant company and the Government on 12 August 1997.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0928DEC004868499
28 septembre 2000
28 septembre 2000
The case-file was forwarded to the Regional Court on 25 August 1995. The appeal was dismissed on 28 December 1994 by the Warsaw Regional Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018DEC002495515
18 octobre 2022
18 octobre 2022
On 9 August 2006, on a news broadcast by “RTP Madeira”, a news ticker was displayed, affirming: “Employee on hunger strike for more than twenty-four hours to contest alleged oppression of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC004118705
27 mars 2012
27 mars 2012
Shortly thereafter the writ of enforcement for the judgment of 16 August 2006 was forwarded by the first-instance court to the Ministry of Finance.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619DEC003505308
19 juin 2012
19 juin 2012
; August and 11 September 2003.
Source officiellePage 91 sur 2136