CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC007225001
3 mai 2005
They hit his head against the wall, twisted his arms, punched his neck and kicked him in the groin. The beatings alternated with admonitions to confess his guilt.
Page 90 sur 1364
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0403JUD002710104
3 avril 2008
The applicant complained about non-enforcement of a judgment in her favour and its quashing by way of supervisory review. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC002412802
7 octobre 2008
While on his way back to his home village, he allegedly met a neighbour, Mr N.N., who was transporting stones in a horse ‑ cart.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD003067403
15 février 2007
On 13 May 2003 the defendant appealed to the Regional Court by way of supervisory review seeking to quash the judgment of 21 January 2003, as upheld on 16 Aril 2003. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0315JUD000856402
15 mars 2007
On 8 August 2001 the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Karachaevo-Cherkessiya Republic, by way of supervisory-review proceedings, quashed the judgment of 11 March 2001 and remitted the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112DEC002670402
12 novembre 2013
xa0; Second round of the supervisory-review proceedings On 12 June 2001 the applicant requested the Supreme Court of Russia to review the decisions of 18 July 2000 and 17 January 2001 by way
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158631
16 octobre 2015
Other citizens are allowed to carry out electoral campaigning, without incurring expenses by way of public gatherings or otherwise.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD000568206
5 février 2015
When not exercising judicial functions, judges are liable under civil, criminal and administrative law in the same way as any other citizen.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1209JUD002079205
9 décembre 2010
In 1993 the applicant was responsible for the privatisation of a State company “A.” by way of a buyout of A. by its employees. 7.
ECLI:CEDH:001-153725
19 mars 2015
In view of the severe criminal punishment a courier could expect for embezzlement of mail, the courier had had no incentive not to deliver the court mail in the appropriate way.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0118DEC005934400
18 janvier 2005
Proceedings concerning the land (i) First set of proceedings The local authorities applied to a court seeking an order to the applicant not to put obstacles to the way of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0127DEC003375296
27 janvier 2000
In 1944 the applicant purchased from F.Z., by way of a notarial deed, a plot of one hectare divided into twelve small lots of land, located in Z. near Warsaw.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD002779003
21 juin 2007
In this way it embodies the “right to a court”, of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0311DEC005478900
11 mars 2003
When confronted with the applicant through a two-way mirror, he identified the applicant as the man who had sexually assaulted him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC005013112
13 janvier 2015
The revisions and the validity of the legal basis on which they were made were challenged by the applicant by way of legal proceedings. 2.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307JUD000633905
7 mars 2006
Les faits, tels qu’ils ont été établis par le juge Wall, qui a entendu les dépositions orales des parties (paragraphe 14 ci-dessous), sont les suivants. A. Le traitement par FIV 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617JUD003878518
17 juin 2025
payment of taxes • Lawful refusal to extinguish the applicant’s tax debt by offsetting it with his enforceable claims against the State unrelated to taxation • Collecting the applicant’s tax debt by way
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0203DEC000460770
3 février 1971
The Court further held as regards the sentence imposed that no point of law was raised which would leave it open to review on an appeal by way of case stated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC001720204
3 juin 2008
In a decision of 13 December 1996, the Office noted that the applicant had carried out heavy work as a slaughterhouse worker until 1982 when he had moved to the USA and worked with renovating walls.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9406
22 mars 2001
The applicants had therefore been directly responsible for the situation which had obtained at the border between the two German States from the beginning of the 1960s until the fall of the Berlin Wall