CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

27 275 résultats pour « Wayl »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC007225001

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2005

3 mai 2005

They hit his head against the wall, twisted his arms, punched his neck and kicked him in the groin. The beatings alternated with admonitions to confess his guilt.

Page 90 sur 1364

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0403JUD002710104

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2008

3 avril 2008

    The applicant complained about non-enforcement of a judgment in her favour and its quashing by way of supervisory review. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC002412802

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2008

7 octobre 2008

While on his way back to his home village, he allegedly met a neighbour, Mr N.N., who was transporting stones in a horse ‑ cart.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD003067403

Admin. suprême

15 février 2007

15 février 2007

    On 13 May 2003 the defendant appealed to the Regional Court by way of supervisory review seeking to quash the judgment of 21   January   2003, as upheld on 16 Aril 2003. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0315JUD000856402

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2007

15 mars 2007

    On 8 August 2001 the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Karachaevo-Cherkessiya Republic, by way of supervisory-review proceedings, quashed the judgment of 11 March 2001 and remitted the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112DEC002670402

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2013

12 novembre 2013

xa0; Second round of the supervisory-review proceedings On 12   June 2001 the applicant requested the Supreme Court of Russia to review the decisions of 18   July 2000 and 17 January 2001 by way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158631

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2015

16 octobre 2015

Other citizens are allowed to carry out electoral campaigning, without incurring expenses by way of public gatherings or otherwise.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD000568206

Admin. suprême

5 février 2015

5 février 2015

    When not exercising judicial functions, judges are liable under civil, criminal and administrative law in the same way as any other citizen.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1209JUD002079205

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2010

9 décembre 2010

    In 1993 the applicant was responsible for the privatisation of a State company “A.” by way of a buyout of A. by its employees. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153725

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2015

19 mars 2015

In view of the severe criminal punishment a courier could expect for embezzlement of mail, the courier had had no incentive not to deliver the court mail in the appropriate way.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0118DEC005934400

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2005

18 janvier 2005

    Proceedings concerning the land (i)     First set of proceedings The local authorities applied to a court seeking an order to the applicant not to put obstacles to the way of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0127DEC003375296

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2000

27 janvier 2000

  In 1944 the applicant purchased from F.Z., by way of a notarial deed, a plot of one hectare divided into twelve small lots of land, located in Z. near Warsaw.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD002779003

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

In this way it embodies the “right to a court”, of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0311DEC005478900

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2003

11 mars 2003

When confronted with the applicant through a two-way mirror, he identified the applicant as the man who had sexually assaulted him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC005013112

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

The revisions and the validity of the legal basis on which they were made were challenged by the applicant by way of legal proceedings. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307JUD000633905

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

Les faits, tels qu’ils ont été établis par le juge Wall, qui a entendu les dépositions orales des parties (paragraphe 14 ci-dessous), sont les suivants. A.   Le traitement par FIV 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617JUD003878518

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2025

17 juin 2025

payment of taxes • Lawful refusal to extinguish the applicant’s tax debt by offsetting it with his enforceable claims against the State unrelated to taxation • Collecting the applicant’s tax debt by way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0203DEC000460770

Admin. suprême

3 février 1971

3 février 1971

  The Court further held as regards the sentence imposed that no point of law was raised which would leave it open to review on an appeal by way of case stated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC001720204

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2008

3 juin 2008

In a decision of 13 December 1996, the Office noted that the applicant had carried out heavy work as a slaughterhouse worker until 1982 when he had moved to the USA and worked with renovating walls.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9406

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2001

22 mars 2001

The applicants had therefore been directly responsible for the situation which had obtained at the border between the two German States from the beginning of the 1960s until the fall of the Berlin Wall

Source officielle