The procedure is adversarial and the doctor, who is entitled to be assisted by his counsel, has the right to address the board.

    Merits The parties' submissions 23.

Merits The parties’ submissions (a)    The applicant 65.

On the next day, upon police advice, she changed her telephone number and email address. 8.

It was not possible to reside at that address.

It provides that if the addressee cannot be found at his or her address, the documents may be served on him via any adult member of the household.

Accordingly, those authorities should have looked not merely at whether there was an authorisation but also at the later peaceful conduct of the actual demonstration.

    Merits 1.     Article 5 § 1 26.     The applicants submitted that there had been no reasonable suspicion warranting their arrest. 27.

The Court heard addresses by Mr Corell for the Government, by Mr Frowein for the Commission and by Mr Palme for the applicant, as well as their replies to its questions.

in a public office or function, in professional life, in a political activity or in another comparable activity, was not to be considered as an invasion of privacy if the reporting was necessary to address

The Appellate Board did address the essence of the points which the applicant had asked it to consider.

The expression “a breach” could not refer merely to a failure to include the statutory notice “Tobacco seriously damages health”.

The third applicant is a British citizen born in 1994 and lives at the same address as the first and second applicant.

The Court heard addresses by Mrs. Maier for the Government and by Mr. Trechsel, Mr. Weitzel and Mr. Schüler for the Commission, as well as their replies to its questions. 10.

s companies had been false and that the arrangement had merely served as a cover for the payment of unreported salaries and withdrawal of undeclared benefits to K.K.

    Merits 1.     The parties' submissions a)     The Government 32.

Turkey (merits), no.   16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

The Court finds that the applicant’s complaint raises serious questions of fact and law which are of such complexity that their determination should depend on an examination of the merits.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.