Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144543
5 mai 2014
5 mai 2014
2 establishes, in particular, that the federal or regional treasury shall be liable for the damage sustained by an individual in the framework of administration of justice provided that the judge’s guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7535
28 mai 2013
28 mai 2013
the decision to proceed without a jury had been made on the basis of material which was not disclosed to them, it was important to note that the undisclosed material did not concern the applicants’ guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-387
13 septembre 2011
13 septembre 2011
His reasons were carefully phrased and not only did he state that his decision was in no way meant to indicate guilt, he added that she had been rightly acquitted by the jury.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194784
25 juin 2019
25 juin 2019
It considered however that the violation was solely a formal one given that the applicant had admitted without any conditions his guilt and thus there had been no consequence on his criminal trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0526DEC003103418
26 mai 2020
26 mai 2020
To the extent that the applicant’s submissions to the effect that he was dismissed without any personal guilt having been demonstrated could be seen as a complaint, in substance, under Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199528
26 novembre 2019
26 novembre 2019
At the trial the applicant denied his guilt and stated that he had been ill-treated by the police in order to extract his confession.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12454
26 mars 2019
26 mars 2019
The reasons why the Court of Appeal had quashed the original trial court judgment appeared to have been largely technical and did not go to the key matter of the applicant’s guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-150289
1 décembre 2014
1 décembre 2014
As evidence of the applicant’s guilt the Court of Appeal referred to the applicant’s confession during the pre-trial investigation in which the applicant testified that he had participated in the robbery
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0519DEC002326308
19 mai 2009
19 mai 2009
In their letter, the customs authorities further announced that they had not been able to obtain any decisive new evidence as to the guilt or innocence of the remaining suspects.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179709
28 novembre 2017
28 novembre 2017
The applicant denied her guilt in the crime during the questioning. On 30 March 2009, in the absence of a lawyer, the applicant was questioned as a suspect and confessed to the crime.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0514DEC000332524
14 mai 2024
14 mai 2024
Conversely, it was of no direct consequence for the determination of his guilt and punishment which was a pre-requisite for the SAC’s standing to initiate review of its constitutionality. 4.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-994859-1027554
11 mai 2004
11 mai 2004
rules in force prior to 1997, the Netherlands courts found that no more than a six-month delay in transferring Mr Brand to a TBS clinic was acceptable and ultimately awarded him 11,250 Netherlands guilders
Source officielleREFERES
69d04f81cdc6046d470a7482
3 avril 2026
3 avril 2026
JUDICIAIRE DES SABLES D’OLONNE ORDONNANCE DE REFERE DU 03 AVRIL 2026 DEMANDEURS Monsieur [T] [P], demeurant [Adresse 1] Madame [R] [P], demeurant [Adresse 1] représentés par Me Pierre-yves LE GUILLY
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2145
10 avril 2012
10 avril 2012
The applicant had accordingly not been punished for the criminal acts of her late husband, and had not inherited his guilt. Conclusion : no violation (unanimously).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116619
17 janvier 2013
17 janvier 2013
It also found that the applicant’s guilt was proved by ample documentary and testimonial evidence.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188939
4 décembre 2018
4 décembre 2018
objective impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention violated on account of the lack of a prosecuting party at the trial and appeal hearings and the use of the offence record as evidence proving her guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11154
12 juillet 2016
12 juillet 2016
was not the Court’s task to determine whether there was a causal connection between any failure on the part of the individuals or the State authorities and the accident, or to reach any findings as to guilt
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2872317-3157967
29 septembre 2009
29 septembre 2009
The Court noted that the appellate court, without any hearings at all, had fully reviewed the lower courts’ judgments and had determined the applicants’ guilt anew.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200782
10 janvier 2020
10 janvier 2020
In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the applicant’s guilt, in whole or in part, on the basis of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court without the Supreme Court
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189924
15 janvier 2019
15 janvier 2019
similar official (a bailiff) was present at the appeal hearing in the case under Article 20.25 of the CAO whereas the courts used the offence record as a piece of evidence proving the defendant’s guilt
Source officiellePage 90 sur 292