CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

255 résultats pour « accotement impraticable »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182191

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2018

12 mars 2018

She has been diagnosed with an “emotionally unstable personality disorder”, which is characterised by a tendency to act impulsively, to conflict with others, and to behave in a self-destructive manner.

Page 9 sur 13

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223742

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

Forensic medical examination act no. 5066 of 19/07/2019 (closed fracture of the finger that could have been caused by a hard blunt object on/around 05/05/2018).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001045483

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 1989

7 juillet 1989

Following the death of his mother, he was received into care by the Liverpool City Council under section 1 of the Children Act 1948 ("the 1948 Act") on 1 September 1960.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD006480816

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

    Child Welfare Act 43.     The relevant sections of the Child Welfare Act of 17 July 1992 ( barnevernloven ) read as follows: Section 4-1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC000387714

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

    Relevant defences (a)     The Defamation Act 1996 45 .     The Defamation Act 1996 amended the law of defamation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2008

27 mai 2008

The applicant’s return would not, therefore, be to a “complete absence of medical treatment”, and so would not subject her to “acute physical and mental suffering”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD007997212

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

It is only where this is clearly impracticable that the information can, as a last resort, be disclosed to the public.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0316REP001225886

Admin. suprême

16 mars 1989

16 mars 1989

  In the Act on the Preservation of Natural Resources (lagen om hushållning med naturresurser m m) this area is mentioned among those which, according to the Act, are considered of national interest

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020JUD004407998

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

By section   12(6) of the Meetings and Marches Act, the time-limit for ruling on the application was five days.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0226JUD005025407

Admin. suprême

26 février 2013

26 février 2013

    On 10 November 2005 the public prosecutor ordered, under sections   42 § 2(2) and 142-b of the Criminal Proceedings Act (“the Act”, see paragraphs 65 and 68 below), secret surveillance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1210DEC001431088

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 1991

10 décembre 1991

and Section 10 of the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1976.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0331DEC001859291

Admin. suprême

31 mars 1993

31 mars 1993

  The Act does   not say that these are the only       provisions under which a compulsory purchase order may be made.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118DEC003141107

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2011

18 janvier 2011

an act of terrorism contrary to section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (the   Encyclopaedia of Afghani Jihad).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115789

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2012

7 décembre 2012

Third, he submitted that the evidence of the postman should have been excluded as prejudicial under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 due to problems with the identification procedure

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD002392219

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

While the hospital was a State institution, the applicant’s dismissal was not an act of public authority, but was governed by private law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD001364206

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2013

14 novembre 2013

    The Police Act (no. 1026-I of 18 April 1991) 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0526JUD003982207

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2011

26 mai 2011

The Public Health Care Act (Act no. 20/1966) 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0217REP001431088

Admin. suprême

17 février 1993

17 février 1993

and section 10 of the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1976.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0108DEC005157899

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2002

8 janvier 2002

Thus the application is founded and it may be possible to obtain proof of the presumed fraudulent acts by making a search without prior warning.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC002112613

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2020

28 avril 2020

    On 7 June 2011 the enforcement court discontinued the enforcement proceedings because the enforcement by seizure and sale of the house indicated by the State was impracticable given that

Source officielle