CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1303269-1362033
31 mars 2005
She also alleged that a former State agent, a Professor Çağlar, had warned her that she would be assassinated if she won her case before the European Court of Human Rights.
Page 9 sur 238
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1214DEC001405388
14 décembre 1988
The applicant asked the judges if any of the judges held shares in AIB.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-764
28 octobre 2010
The redemption value of the shares held by the minority shareholders, including the applicant, was determined by contract.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218383
15 juin 2022
In 2008 it was decided to increase the company’s share capital by 3,680,000 euros (EUR) by creating new shares.
ECLI:CEDH:001-178485
10 octobre 2017
She concluded that the constitutionality of Section 14 (3) and (5) of Law no. 4389, pertaining to the transfer of the bank’s shares to the Fund, should be assessed by the Constitutional Court in so far
ECLI:CEDH:001-217508
3 mai 2022
from its portfolio to him, and (b) order the bank to record him as holder of that number of shares in the bank’s register of shareholders.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13012
19 novembre 2020
Following a government decision on the bank’s restructuring and recovery, all shares in the bank were revoked and cancelled, including those of the applicant company. They appealed unsuccessfully.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214432
23 novembre 2021
Did the applicant bank have possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?
ECLI:CEDH:001-187357
2 octobre 2018
The municipality, as represented by the Council, owned 80% of the shares in that company. 4 .
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-103886
2 décembre 2010
According to the Court, only a hearing of the jurors would have been likely to shed light on the nature of the remarks exchanged and the influence they might have had, if any, on their opinions.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0115JUD001043510
15 janvier 2026
Together they own 35% of M.’s shares.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411DEC002980004
11 avril 2006
Judge Behrens therefore concluded that the applicant was not a legitimate child of his grandfather within the meaning of his grandfather’s will, and that the disputed share of the estate passed
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709JUD003819112
9 juillet 2015
of the shares in the corporation’s extraordinary shareholders’ meeting.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:C300485
2 mai 2012
que la Société de mécanique générale de Charenton n'ayant pas invoqué dans ses conclusions l'état de vétusté de la toiture pour revendiquer l'application de l'article 1755 du code civil, le moyen, mélangé
6137236ecd58014677409a97
28 juin 2000
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société des Pétroles Shell, dont le siège est ..., en cassation
ECLI:CEDH:001-174274
17 mai 2017
A shareholders’ meeting took place on 30 October 2002. The meeting was attended by Mr A. and the notary mentioned above.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0531DEC002449317
31 mai 2022
Justice I.E. had 976 shares in Kaupþing bank, which she sold in May and September 2008. 7. Justice M.S. did not have any shares in Kaupþing bank. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0702DEC004026507
2 juillet 2013
The remaining 4.89% of the shares were held by municipalities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1018DEC002247093
18 octobre 1995
S could sell their shares to the applicant. On 3 March 1988 Mr. and Mrs.
ECLI:CEDH:001-200674
15 janvier 2020
Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)2 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Five cases against Greece (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 January 2020 at the 1364 th meeting