AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0831DEC002389002
31 août 2006
31 août 2006
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0907DEC000394703
7 septembre 2006
7 septembre 2006
The parties’ submissions 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0907DEC000437802
7 septembre 2006
7 septembre 2006
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0918DEC006987501
18 septembre 2006
18 septembre 2006
He shall also inform the injured party that that party may conduct the prosecution himself.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926DEC000351402
26 septembre 2006
26 septembre 2006
The court further found that other parts of the article were not defamatory.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0205DEC007546901
5 février 2007
5 février 2007
A party to criminal or civil proceedings could seek the intervention of those officials to apply for such a review.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC000077303
10 avril 2007
10 avril 2007
valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of Ukraine; or a party was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC002194903
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
In June 1999 J.W. started cohabiting with her new partner A.F. They married in September 1999. Another visit contact between the applicant and his daughter took place at Christmas 2000.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC006708601
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
On 23 April 2002 the Supreme Court quashed Mr Savelyev’s conviction in part and sentenced him to three years and seven months’ imprisonment. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC006261700
7 mars 2006
7 mars 2006
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503DEC002205702
3 mai 2007
3 mai 2007
The Court’s assessment The Court considers, in the light of the parties’ submissions, that this part of the application raises complex issues of law and fact under the Convention, the determination
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC003214704
15 mai 2007
15 mai 2007
On an unspecified date the appeal court quashed the decision of 9 February 2004 regarding the part concerning A.’s stay in hospital and upheld the part concerning provisional custody.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2721
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2735
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
The Court did not deem it necessary to decide in the present case whether or not the Georgian President constituted part of “the legislature”, as, in any event, the applicant party could not validly claim
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607DEC002606402
7 juin 2007
7 juin 2007
The Court’s assessment The Court considers, in the light of the parties’ submissions, that this part of the application raises complex issues of law and fact under the Convention, the determination
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5522
28 août 2001
28 août 2001
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC005275099
28 août 2001
28 août 2001
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC003350596
28 août 2001
28 août 2001
The parties made numerous requests for the taking of evidence. One tenant in particular filed numerous objections against the minutes of the hearings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC003919798
11 septembre 2001
11 septembre 2001
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC004001698
11 septembre 2001
11 septembre 2001
He is represented before the Court by Lansky & Partner, a law firm practising in Vienna. A.
Source officiellePage 9 sur 93779