On 24 July 2009 the applicant also lodged a complaint with the Child Protection Agency, stating that his wife refused to give him access to the child and was manipulating the child into rejecting

Child Abduction (“the 1980 Hague Convention”).

if such an action would place the child in an intolerable situation.

Her claim was dismissed by the domestic courts as it was not deemed to be in the best interests of the child.

On 23 January the Child-Care Authority requested the Service for Family Assistance and Child Welfare to mediate.

child welfare authorities: Article   5 §   1 applicable; violation Facts – The applicants are a mother and her child, who was eight years old at the material time.

A, ainsi que celles de Me Grau, représentant la commune de Chailly-en-Brie.

Given that the child was in need of care and attention, it had to be concluded that the child needed protection. There was an approved foster family which could take care of the child.

xa0; a child who is claimed back within a period of two months by the parent who entrusted the child to the Child Welfare Service will be returned to that parent without any further formalities ( Article

the child.

  On 23 April 2003 the Swiss Federal Court ordered the return of the child to Italy. The child and his mother returned to Italy.

A report drawn up by a child neuropsychiatrist stated that the child was no doubt physically fit but not psychologically fit for the journey.

interests of the child.

in the creation of a legal mother-child relationship.

Divorce, child residence and child maintenance proceedings 21 .

At the mother’s request, the Italian courts granted a divorce and decided to give custody of the child to the mother, on the principal ground that, at that time, the child had been living with her for

Since that time the child has been living in Ukraine.

The applicant and his wife, A.A.C., had a child, A, born on 1 April 2005. In 2006 the couple divorced and the mother was granted custody of the child.

On 20   November the NSPCC submitted their risk assessment, which recommended that the child be returned quickly to his parents’ care. The child was returned on 8   December 1997.