CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

301 résultats pour « Audrey MATZ »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD001488005

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

She allegedly promised to register his complaint and to bring the matter to the prosecutor’s attention.

Page 9 sur 16

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD000109908

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2012

22 mai 2012

by a subsidiary prosecutor, the public prosecutor shall nevertheless have the power, up until the conclusion of the main hearing ( do završetka glavnog pretresa ), to resume the prosecution of the matter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD002687205

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2012

23 octobre 2012

Government further accept that the investigation carried out into the circumstances surrounding the death of the applicant’s son was not compatible with Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, and that this matter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD007721717

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2024

18 juillet 2024

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC003976806

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

render the remedy ineffective; it is then appropriate to take as the start of the six-month period the date when he first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Audrey

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109JUD002573205

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2010

9 novembre 2010

Accordingly, it remitted that matter for fresh consideration. 19 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD003205902

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2008

3 juillet 2008

Thus, it considers that these matters fall to be examined below under the substantive provisions of the Convention. II.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212JUD001700807

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

Consequently, States are dispensed from answering for their acts before an international body before they have had the opportunity to put matters right through their own legal systems (see, for example

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1048845-1085469

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2004

8 juillet 2004

Marea Cameră a decis să ţină o audiere asupra admisibilităţii şi fondului cererii, iar preşedintele a invitat guvernul român să participe la această audiere.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324JUD001181802

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

In so far as the Government argue that the applicant’s Article 2 complaint is premature, the Court considers that that contention is a matter which is indissociable from the applicant’s allegation that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215JUD001890702

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2009

15 décembre 2009

render the remedy ineffective, it is appropriate to take as the start of the six-month period the date when he first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Audrey

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1211DEC001863191

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 1991

11 décembre 1991

  He considered that these matters could only be assessed by returning to the applicant's own account which was deemed wholly inconsistent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD003558708

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2014

31 juillet 2014

case to the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Azerbaijan for further investigation, relying on the CIS Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0919JUD000726810

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2019

19 septembre 2019

    The Court may only deal with the matter ... within a period of six months from the date on which the final decision was taken. ...” 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221JUD005264307

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

Consequently, States are dispensed from answering for their acts before an international body before they have had the opportunity to put matters right through their own legal systems (see, for example

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0907DEC002420007

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2010

7 septembre 2010

The Court's practice in this matter can be derived, among others, from the judgments in the cases of Rodić and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204JUD002603918

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2025

4 décembre 2025

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 2.     From June 2015 onwards the applicants’ son was performing his military service with the fire brigade of a military unit stationed in the Kirovohrad Region.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306DEC005441509

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

In submissions of 16 April 2007, the Ministry of the Interior confirmed its position indicated in its letter of 11 July 2005 and invited the public prosecutor to clarify the matter with the Ministry of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD002078914

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2021

10 juin 2021

By a decision dated 9 September 2013 the Higher Specialised Court of Ukraine in Civil and Criminal Matters refused to open cassation proceedings. Criminal investigation as regards the narcologist 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902DEC002010606

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2010

2 septembre 2010

On 27 November 2000 jurisdiction in the matter was transferred to the Vukovar County Court ( Županijski sud u Vukovaru ) and the investigation resumed.

Source officielle