CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD004470411
22 avril 2021
The Court considers that the issue under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention raised in the present case does not merely concern an incidental failure of the domestic courts to address properly
Page 89 sur 145
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC004892599
23 mai 2006
On 13 July 2001 the court refused the interim measure and proceeded to hear the merits.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC000077303
10 avril 2007
was in the United Kingdom; - the proof of registered agent services and the proof of its registered office and its permanent operational address.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD005241518
20 mai 2021
Merits The parties’ submissions 60.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD006235609
31 mars 2016
On 9 September 2009 the Court of Cassation decided to return the appeal as inadmissible for lack of merit. 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD003776304
27 janvier 2009
Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0316DEC003307996
16 mars 2000
The decision to impose detention on remand could be appealed against, within a seven-day time-limit, to the court competent to deal with the merits of the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004082012
10 juillet 2014
The object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address an allegation that a Convention right has been violated and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD002852303
5 juin 2012
It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202JUD003085603
2 décembre 2010
He further requested the addressees to prevent such applications in future. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626JUD002532102
26 juin 2007
This order shall include the nature and amount of the charge and the tax-payer's details, including the address.” THE LAW I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD002121812
15 septembre 2020
In the view of the commission of inquiry, G.R.’s failure to properly supervise the work of the police and to address its multiple shortcomings gave reason to question her competence as a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD003937815
7 décembre 2021
to the applicant company; moreover, he or she may, optionally, submit a postal address.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD006946614
Merits Submissions by the parties (a) The applicants 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0208DEC003586310
8 février 2011
Evidence that C had also, during December 2005, indicated to defence witness M that she did not believe allegations of abuse made by the other two complainers would, at its highest, merely have provided
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409DEC000718921
9 avril 2024
The applicant and the Government each filed memorials on the admissibility and merits of the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD003376102
6 décembre 2007
They merely made a general reference to the Supreme Court's powers as an appeal court. 62.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109
27 novembre 2014
The view of the first-instance court that it was not necessary to address the third, subsidiary, ground for the strike is correct.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD001598709
17 mai 2016
In such circumstances, the court could not accept that the authorities had refused to address the applicant’s request. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921JUD005366115
21 septembre 2017
On 22 February 2010 the applicant requested that the District Court disclose C.B.’s address, which had been kept secret from him. 37.