CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 899 résultats pour « Merrily ADRASSE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD004470411

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

    The Court considers that the issue under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention raised in the present case does not merely concern an incidental failure of the domestic courts to address properly

Page 89 sur 145

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC004892599

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2006

23 mai 2006

On 13 July 2001 the court refused the interim measure and proceeded to hear the merits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC000077303

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2007

10 avril 2007

was in the United Kingdom; -     the proof of registered agent services and the proof of its registered office and its permanent operational address.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD005241518

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

Merits The parties’ submissions 60.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD006235609

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2016

31 mars 2016

    On 9 September 2009 the Court of Cassation decided to return the appeal as inadmissible for lack of merit. 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD003776304

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0316DEC003307996

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2000

16 mars 2000

The decision to impose detention on remand could be appealed against, within a seven-day time-limit, to the court competent to deal with the merits of the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004082012

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

The object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address an allegation that a Convention right has been violated and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD002852303

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2012

5 juin 2012

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202JUD003085603

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2010

2 décembre 2010

He further requested the addressees to prevent such applications in future. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626JUD002532102

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2007

26 juin 2007

This order shall include the nature and amount of the charge and the tax-payer's details, including the address.” THE LAW I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD002121812

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2020

15 septembre 2020

    In the view of the commission of inquiry, G.R.’s failure to properly supervise the work of the police and to address its multiple shortcomings gave reason to question her competence as a

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD003937815

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2021

7 décembre 2021

to the applicant company; moreover, he or she may, optionally, submit a postal address.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD006946614

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

Merits Submissions by the parties (a)    The applicants 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0208DEC003586310

Admin. suprême

8 février 2011

8 février 2011

Evidence that C had also, during December 2005, indicated to defence witness M that she did not believe allegations of abuse made by the other two complainers would, at its highest, merely have provided

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409DEC000718921

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

    The applicant and the Government each filed memorials on the admissibility and merits of the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD003376102

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2007

6 décembre 2007

They merely made a general reference to the Supreme Court's powers as an appeal court. 62.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2014

27 novembre 2014

The view of the first-instance court that it was not necessary to address the third, subsidiary, ground for the strike is correct.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD001598709

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2016

17 mai 2016

In such circumstances, the court could not accept that the authorities had refused to address the applicant’s request. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921JUD005366115

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2017

21 septembre 2017

    On 22 February 2010 the applicant requested that the District Court disclose C.B.’s address, which had been kept secret from him. 37.

Source officielle