CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

5 834 résultats pour « Guilhers »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1209DEC001237086

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 1987

9 décembre 1987

      The applicant complains that the refusal of legal aid by the magistrate indicates that he presumed the applicant's guilt, contrary to Article 6 para. 2 (Art. 6-2) of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202313

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2020

4 mars 2020

In substantiating the applicant’s guilt, the Criminal Court of Appeal also relied on Z.A.’s statements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC004154122

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2025

2 décembre 2025

    The Court notes that the trial court relied to a certain extent on J.K.’s statement as a victim in order to establish the applicant’s guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC000638315

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2023

5 septembre 2023

whether the proceedings were fair the Court does not act as a court of fourth instance deciding on whether evidence has been obtained unlawfully in terms of domestic law, its admissibility, or on the guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245113

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2025

2 septembre 2025

In July 2015 his conviction was quashed by the Constitutional Court which held that the lower courts should not have started their examination of the applicant’s guilt or innocence with a conclusion that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0514DEC004683618

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2024

14 mai 2024

The Court of Appeal elaborated on that finding by holding that the tapped telephone conversations and covertly recorded conversations were the starting point of the determination of the applicant’s guilt

Source officielle
CA

13e chambre

6033c6ac59e2597922d7fce1

Appel

30 mars 2017

30 mars 2017

SEPT, La cour d'appel de Versailles, a rendu l'arrêt suivant dans l'affaire entre : - Maître [S] [I] [Adresse 1] - SCP BTSG [Adresse 2] Représenté(e) par Maître Alexandre OPSOMER de la SCP GUEILHERS

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1206DEC001309117

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2022

6 décembre 2022

[W]hat is extremely serious, [going] beyond affecting the interests of the guild, is that ..., by acting to suspend the Order ..., the ... members of the organised group leading [the VCP] ignore with criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC002194093

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 1994

2 septembre 1994

It thus held that the evidence suggested by the applicant was of no relevance to the question of the applicant's guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1219DEC000284066

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 1969

19 décembre 1969

In the grounds of the decision, the Court stated that the applicant's guilt with regard to the theft charge was established beyond any reasonable doubt (mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203819

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2020

16 juin 2020

inadmissibility of [A.G.’s pre-trial statement and the record of the confrontation between A.G. and the applicant] as well as the impossibility of relying on that evidence to substantiate the accused’s guilt

Source officielle
CAA

5ème chambre

DCA_21NT00250_20220419

Admin. Appel

19 avril 2022

19 avril 2022

Par un mémoire en défense enregistré le 28 mai 2021, la commune de Gouesnach, représentée par Mes Gourvennec et Guil, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu'il soit mis à la charge des requérantes une

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-91172

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2009

9 janvier 2009

qualified as “tenuous” the distinction drawn between the role of the judge G. in extending detention on remand (a decision which must be based on a relatively firm presumption as to the applicant’s guilt

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2306167-2468060

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2008

26 mars 2008

He was, however, acquitted of the charges under Article 213 as the court found that his guilt had not been proven to the standard required in criminal proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10070

Admin. suprême

8 juin 1995

8 juin 1995

Expression "the state of the evidence": could be understood to mean the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt - in the instant case those circumstances could not on their own justify

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10083

Admin. suprême

8 juin 1995

8 juin 1995

Expression "the state of the evidence": could be understood to mean the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt - in the instant case those circumstances could not on their own justify

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5496

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2001

4 septembre 2001

Inadmissible under Article 6 § 1: (a)   under Italian law, the confiscation of the applicants’ property under preventive measures did not connote a finding of guilt but was intended to prevent criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5968

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2000

25 juillet 2000

In both cases the appellate court was required to deal with facts and law in order to ascertain the applicants’ guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55697

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 1999

18 janvier 1999

Convention by Mrs A.P., Mr   M.P. and Mr T.P., Swiss nationals, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaints under Article 6, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, that irrespective of any personal guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7693

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

The investigating authorities had had material evidence of their guilt.

Source officielle

Page 89 sur 292

← PrécédentSuivant →