AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146650
5 septembre 2014
5 septembre 2014
On 13 May 2010, 24 June 2010, 5 August 2010, 25 August 2010, 26 August 2010 the Adana Magistrates’ Court dismissed the applicant’s objections without holding hearings by decisions against which
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3269
1 juin 2006
1 juin 2006
On an appeal by the applicant the detention order was set aside, on 2 August 1999, by the court’s “specialised division” having jurisdiction for the review of precautionary measures.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209681
30 mars 2021
30 mars 2021
On 15 August 2020 the applicant was arrested again. On 16 August 2020 Derbent Town Court of Dagestan Republic issued detention order in his respect.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-154055
30 mars 2015
30 mars 2015
On 2 August 2007 the same court sentenced bailiff D. to a fine for excess of power which caused grave consequences.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179706
30 novembre 2017
30 novembre 2017
In particular, between August and November 2006 the applicant requested the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal to provide him with a copy of his indictment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC000676605
15 avril 2014
15 avril 2014
On 6 August 2003 the Municipal Court issued the enforcement order, authorising the applicant to perform the necessary repairs herself or to entrust them to a professional, the costs of which were
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018DEC000974403
18 octobre 2007
18 octobre 2007
By decision of the Prikubanskiy District Court of the town of Krasnodar of 2 August 2000 the applicant became the owner of one half of an estate in the town of Anapa.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0607DEC001733202
7 juin 2005
7 juin 2005
On 28 August 1998 the Dobropolsky City Court ordered the State mine Belitskaya to pay the applicant UAH 10,015 in compensation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1130DEC007268201
30 novembre 2004
30 novembre 2004
In August 2000 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Lisichansk City Court against the Melnikov mine (a State-owned enterprise) to recover unpaid salary.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111306
16 mai 2012
16 mai 2012
Between 27 August and 23 November 2001 the applicant was kidnapped by three individuals.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0607DEC001438702
7 juin 2005
7 juin 2005
On 15 August 2000 the Dobropolsky City Court ordered the State mine Belitskaya to pay the applicant UAH 26,017.34 in compensation.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14352
3 mai 2022
3 mai 2022
On 20 August 2021 eleven applicants (nos. 1-11) (including young children) were allowed to enter Latvia, while fourteen others (nos.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179671
30 novembre 2017
30 novembre 2017
font-size:14pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Communicated on 30 November 2017 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 46134/09 Rabiyya MAMMADOVA against Azerbaijan lodged on 17 August
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148784
17 novembre 2014
17 novembre 2014
In particular, his requests were dismissed on 5 August 2010, 4 February and 20 December 2011.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12599
19 septembre 2019
19 septembre 2019
The applicant maintained that it was only on 24 August 2009 that he had received a copy of that decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242134
30 janvier 2025
30 janvier 2025
Volodymyrivna SKRYPNICHENKO against Ukraine lodged on 11 July 2020 communicated on 30 January 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the death of the applicant’s son, E., on 29 August
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244912
28 août 2025
28 août 2025
On 4 August 2020 the investigator in charge of the case decided to restrict the applicant’s rights to visits by and telephone conversations with persons other than his lawyer.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4577
27 novembre 2003
27 novembre 2003
Upon returning to Prague, on 25 August 1997, the applicants, at the request of the chief of police in Warsaw, were considered to be persons whose presence on Polish territory was undesirable.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116572
6 décembre 2012
6 décembre 2012
On 25 August 2006, two individuals, noticing that the applicant was speaking Hungarian on the phone, attacked her shouting «In Slovakia in Slovak» and caused serious injuries to the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221442
7 novembre 2022
7 novembre 2022
The applicant was the shareholder of a company which provided internet services to numerous public authorities pursuant to longstanding contracts that pre-dated 2 August 2013, when he was elected member
Source officiellePage 89 sur 2136