CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

42 707 résultats pour « Auguste »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146650

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2014

5 septembre 2014

On 13 May 2010, 24 June 2010, 5 August 2010, 25 August 2010, 26   August 2010 the Adana Magistrates’ Court dismissed the applicant’s objections without holding hearings by decisions against which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3269

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

On an appeal by the applicant the detention order was set aside, on 2 August 1999, by the court’s “specialised division” having jurisdiction for the review of precautionary measures.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209681

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2021

30 mars 2021

    On 15 August 2020 the applicant was arrested again. On 16 August 2020 Derbent Town Court of Dagestan Republic issued detention order in his respect.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154055

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2015

30 mars 2015

On 2 August 2007 the same court sentenced bailiff D. to a fine for excess of power which caused grave consequences.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179706

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2017

30 novembre 2017

In particular, between August and November 2006 the applicant requested the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal to provide him with a copy of his indictment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC000676605

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

On 6   August 2003 the Municipal Court issued the enforcement order, authorising the applicant to perform the necessary repairs herself or to entrust them to a professional, the costs of which were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018DEC000974403

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2007

18 octobre 2007

By decision of the Prikubanskiy District Court of the town of Krasnodar of 2 August 2000 the applicant became the owner of one half of an estate in the town of Anapa.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0607DEC001733202

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2005

7 juin 2005

On 28   August   1998 the Dobropolsky City Court ordered the State mine Belitskaya to pay the applicant UAH   10,015 in compensation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1130DEC007268201

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2004

30 novembre 2004

In August 2000 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Lisichansk City Court against the Melnikov mine (a State-owned enterprise) to recover unpaid salary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111306

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2012

16 mai 2012

Between 27 August and 23 November 2001 the applicant was kidnapped by three individuals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0607DEC001438702

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2005

7 juin 2005

On 15 August 2000 the Dobropolsky City Court ordered the State mine Belitskaya to pay the applicant UAH   26,017.34 in compensation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14352

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

On 20   August 2021 eleven applicants (nos.   1-11) (including young children) were allowed to enter Latvia, while fourteen others (nos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179671

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2017

30 novembre 2017

font-size:14pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 30 November 2017   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 46134/09 Rabiyya MAMMADOVA against Azerbaijan lodged on 17 August

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148784

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2014

17 novembre 2014

In particular, his requests were dismissed on 5 August 2010, 4   February and 20 December 2011.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12599

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2019

19 septembre 2019

The applicant maintained that it was only on 24   August 2009 that he had received a copy of that decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242134

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2025

30 janvier 2025

Volodymyrivna SKRYPNICHENKO against Ukraine lodged on 11 July 2020 communicated on 30 January 2025   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the death of the applicant’s son, E., on 29   August

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244912

Admin. suprême

28 août 2025

28 août 2025

On 4 August 2020 the investigator in charge of the case decided to restrict the applicant’s rights to visits by and telephone conversations with persons other than his lawyer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4577

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2003

27 novembre 2003

Upon returning to Prague, on 25 August 1997, the applicants, at the request of the chief of police in Warsaw, were considered to be persons whose presence on Polish territory was undesirable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116572

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2012

6 décembre 2012

On 25 August 2006, two individuals, noticing that the applicant was speaking Hungarian on the phone, attacked her shouting «In Slovakia in Slovak» and caused serious injuries to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221442

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2022

7 novembre 2022

The applicant was the shareholder of a company which provided internet services to numerous public authorities pursuant to longstanding contracts that pre-dated 2 August 2013, when he was elected member

Source officielle

Page 89 sur 2136

← PrécédentSuivant →