Article 32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to Interim Resolution DH (99) 257, adopted on 15 April

of:   Ján Šikuta, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 16 April

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2002)95 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 April

   On 11 April 1990 the applicant was granted the first degree status of disability (serious disability).

Nor did [the applicant] appear in court from 6 to 9 April 2010.

8], de nationalité française, domiciliée au [Adresse 4], représentée par Maître Julien LOMBARD, de l’AARPI VICTOIRE AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire #B0052 DÉFENDERESSES La société APRIL

Bulgaria , no. 43531/08, §§ 59-60, 16 April 2013).

    On 15 April 2011 a Parole Board hearing took place.

Proceedings concerning the action of 12 April 2000 On 12 April 2000 the applicant challenged several decisions taken by the general meeting of a limited liability company on 23 March 2000.

He remained in pre-trial detention pending investigation and trial until 13 April 2012. The courts based their detention orders on stereotyped formula described above.

At the hearing of 28   April 2003 the trial court heard the parties’ final submissions.

The judgment of 30 April 1998 became final on 4 June 1998. B.

    The judgment of 28 April 2000 in the applicant’s favour and its enforcement On 28 April 2000 the District Court ordered the Voronezh regional administration to pay the applicant 7,126.97

On 14   April   2008 the second applicant was detained on remand and placed in the Wronki detention centre.

On 17   April 2014 he was formally arrested.

  54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018).

    The incidents on 24 and 25 April 2002 (a)     The applicant’s account 5.

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 7 April 1998 and was rejected on 14 April 1998 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

On 9 April 2009 the Moldovan authorities introduced a visa regime with Romania.